|
Post by Skillz on Apr 20, 2009 18:17:18 GMT -5
They need a big so they can go with a normal lineup
Beidrenes-Big-Randolph-Jax-Ellis would be nice
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Apr 20, 2009 18:21:24 GMT -5
who should the knicks draft?
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Apr 20, 2009 19:06:49 GMT -5
i want flynn, curry, or t-will if none of the top guys are available
I think all of the above would fit well in the system
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 20, 2009 19:09:37 GMT -5
They need a big so they can go with a normal lineup Beidrenes-Big-Randolph-Jax-Ellis would be nice How is Randolph at 3 normal? I mean hes huge for a SF.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 20, 2009 19:09:56 GMT -5
who should the knicks draft? Start your own thread. GTFO.
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Apr 20, 2009 19:12:09 GMT -5
Sim and I will
|
|
Scott
Starter
Cleveland Cavaliers
Cavs GM
Posts: 2,662
|
Post by Scott on Apr 20, 2009 19:58:20 GMT -5
I really liked Harden's game a lot from what I watched this season. If they can maybe move a combo of Crawford, Bellinelli, and Wright like previously mentioned for a 4, then Harden would fit in well with Ellis and Jackson at the 1-2-3. Not sure how the bench would look for them at the wings with Crawford/Bellinelli out of the picture, but I think Harden would fit in really nicely.
Like you guys also said, I think Clark would go nicely too to fit into Nellie's plan.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 20, 2009 21:10:51 GMT -5
I really liked Harden's game a lot from what I watched this season. If they can maybe move a combo of Crawford, Bellinelli, and Wright like previously mentioned for a 4, then Harden would fit in well with Ellis and Jackson at the 1-2-3. Not sure how the bench would look for them at the wings with Crawford/Bellinelli out of the picture, but I think Harden would fit in really nicely. Like you guys also said, I think Clark would go nicely too to fit into Nellie's plan. Well there is Azubuike who can play 2 or 3. Morrow who is a 2. Watson who can play some 1. We have depth. Then there is Maggette still. I think drafting a small guy that can only play 1 would be counterproductive but getting a SG that can swing to 1 like Evans or Harden might work. I also wouldnt want a wing that couldnt play 1, like DeRozan. Id rather get a big wing like Clark.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Apr 20, 2009 21:31:26 GMT -5
Wizards get Blake. Wizards win title.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Apr 21, 2009 8:06:27 GMT -5
Is Azubuike actually a legit starter in the NBA nowdays?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 21, 2009 9:14:51 GMT -5
Is Azubuike actually a legit starter in the NBA nowdays? I think he is. Hes made great strides. 14 ppg 5 rpg 1.6 apg 1.3 topg 46/81/45 I think he has the chance to be someone like John Salmons. Not a star, but a solid 4th player on a team. Actually I see lots of similarities between the Warriors and Bulls, except I think the Warriors actually have more upside all around outside of Derrick Rose.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Apr 21, 2009 9:21:37 GMT -5
I see....Honestly I think the Warriors have to take bpa with their pick. I think ideally Jennings falls to them. He would fit great with their style and is a much better ball handler/passer than Monta. Let Monta either slide to the 2 or have him as a super combo guy off the bench.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Apr 21, 2009 9:25:13 GMT -5
Yeah Azubuike is a legit starter on that atrocious Golden State team if you think he can play anywhere else and start you guys are insane.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 21, 2009 9:28:24 GMT -5
Yeah Azubuike is a legit starter on that atrocious Golden State team if you think he can play anywhere else and start you guys are insane. I think he could start on a lot of teams.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Apr 21, 2009 9:32:16 GMT -5
He's atheltic and has a decent mid-range game. That's it. On teams that don't run the ball and primarily deal with half court sets he'd be awful because he's also a ball hog.
|
|
Pacman
All-Star
Boston Celtics
2023 & 2031 BBS CHAMPIONS
Posts: 7,370
|
Post by Pacman on Apr 21, 2009 9:35:20 GMT -5
Meh, I like buike but I would try to package him for a big. His value is good right now.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Apr 21, 2009 9:36:53 GMT -5
I think he is a good backup.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 21, 2009 10:08:36 GMT -5
I think he is a good backup. Ideally hes a backup, but hes better then someone like Deshawn Stevenson.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 21, 2009 10:10:20 GMT -5
He's atheltic and has a decent mid-range game. That's it. On teams that don't run the ball and primarily deal with half court sets he'd be awful because he's also a ball hog. Just because he doesnt pass doesnt mean hes a ball hog. Thats his role, to shoot or to score. He isnt someone that can create. It doesnt mean he dominates the ball and makes poor decisions.
|
|
|
Post by Apollo on Apr 21, 2009 10:27:41 GMT -5
They should draft me.
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Apr 21, 2009 10:33:06 GMT -5
Did he learn to play defense recently?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 21, 2009 11:11:07 GMT -5
Did he learn to play defense recently? Hes a mediocre defender, but he has the tools to be solid.
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Apr 21, 2009 12:08:51 GMT -5
Clark is someone that comes to mind. Can play 3 or 4 in the Warriors system. Versatile. I really like our wings already though so it may not be a great fit. Really would absolutley hate it if we took Clark.
|
|
Jay
Starter
Ex-GM
Bang...Bang...
Posts: 3,220
|
Post by Jay on Apr 21, 2009 13:01:02 GMT -5
The Warriors need to fire Chris Mullin and Don Nelson. Until then, they could draft 3 LeBrons and still be a joke. They don't want to win basketball games, that organization just wants to score.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 21, 2009 19:58:30 GMT -5
The Warriors need to fire Chris Mullin and Don Nelson. Until then, they could draft 3 LeBrons and still be a joke. They don't want to win basketball games, that organization just wants to score. Mullin is fired and Nelson is pretty close to the front office. I think Keith Smart will be the next coach(in 2 years) unless Nelson gets fired next year.
|
|