Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Apr 28, 2009 20:08:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Apr 28, 2009 20:13:58 GMT -5
2 hits, a walk, and 2 errors. Double with 2 on. 2 runs.  |
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Apr 28, 2009 20:16:52 GMT -5
Sad I tell you.
I'm curious to see if more than 2 runs has ever been scored in baseball history with only 3 players on base for the entire game...
|
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Apr 28, 2009 20:24:08 GMT -5
There could have been 5 players on base in that game. Plus, definitely 3 players on base = 3 runs in dozens of games in MLB history.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Apr 28, 2009 20:27:24 GMT -5
pretty sure it's happened plenty of times.
|
|
|
|
Post by Apollo on Apr 28, 2009 20:35:48 GMT -5
pretty sure it's happened plenty of times. i'm pretty sure almost everything has happened plenty of times in baseball |
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Apr 28, 2009 20:36:23 GMT -5
nah not really, ask tim kurkjian
|
|
|
|
Post by Apollo on Apr 28, 2009 20:38:46 GMT -5
That's like saying the Simpsons have done that joke before
When you're around long enough, it's bound to have happened.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Apr 28, 2009 20:45:14 GMT -5
There are baseball "phenomenons" that have never happened. pointless discussion though
|
|
|
|
Post by Apollo on Apr 28, 2009 20:45:58 GMT -5
There are baseball "phenomenons" that have never happened. pointless discussion though Pretty much why I used the word "almost." |
|
|
|
Post by Apollo on Apr 28, 2009 20:47:44 GMT -5
Like someone on ESPN said the Marlins were the first team ever to start 11-1 then go 0-7. What a stupid stat. I bet there would be a first for a team to go 31-10 then go 0-4, but who cares?
That'd be like saying the Rockets are on a 21-12 run in the 1st quarter when the score is 21-12.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Apr 28, 2009 20:47:47 GMT -5
this thread is going places
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Apr 28, 2009 20:47:52 GMT -5
There could have been 5 players on base in that game. Plus, definitely 3 players on base = 3 runs in dozens of games in MLB history. 5 guys on base? how? |
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Apr 28, 2009 20:49:40 GMT -5
There could have been 5 players on base in that game. Plus, definitely 3 players on base = 3 runs in dozens of games in MLB history. 5 guys on base? how? 2 hits and a walk, + two guys reaching base on error. I'm not sure if they reached base on an error or advanced from first to second, second to third etc on an error, but 2 hits, a walk, and 2 errors could get 5 base runners. |
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Apr 28, 2009 20:51:09 GMT -5
2 hits and a walk, + two guys reaching base on error. I'm not sure if they reached base on an error or advanced from first to second, second to third etc on an error, but 2 hits, a walk, and 2 errors could get 5 base runners. But whitesox made the errors. So it's factual that the sox only had 3 base runners for the entire game. |
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Apr 28, 2009 20:52:41 GMT -5
Ohhh my bad, looked at the box quickly a while ago. You're right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Apr 29, 2009 22:50:32 GMT -5
this thread is going places lol'd big time. |
|
