|
Post by Spencer on Jun 9, 2009 13:11:52 GMT -5
Tell me what you think....
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 9, 2009 13:14:34 GMT -5
Theyd both be pretty sick obviously. I could wait till they were 28-30 so they'd be C potential guys and just go through 1 MAX contract.
|
|
aar
All-Star
Seattle SuperSonics
Posts: 6,306
|
Post by aar on Jun 9, 2009 13:14:43 GMT -5
There should be a lottery for them
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jun 9, 2009 13:15:04 GMT -5
No. Don't put them in the league.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 9, 2009 13:16:12 GMT -5
Interesting. Couple of ideas. Maybe some of the lower tier franchises can enter a lotto and the 3 winners can offer them contracts but other teams cant? Or the same scenario with all franchises.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 9, 2009 13:16:34 GMT -5
No. Don't put them in the league. Reasoning?
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jun 9, 2009 13:17:44 GMT -5
Interesting. Couple of ideas. Maybe some of the lower tier franchises can enter a lotto and the 3 winners can offer them contracts but other teams cant? Or the same scenario with all franchises. i love it, do it.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jun 9, 2009 13:17:49 GMT -5
Just fudge their age and lets make them prospects. Next draft is going to suck, isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jun 9, 2009 13:18:30 GMT -5
Interesting. Couple of ideas. Maybe some of the lower tier franchises can enter a lotto and the 3 winners can offer them contracts but other teams cant? Or the same scenario with all franchises. What constitutes a lower tier franchise? I don't think anyone needs a hand out.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 9, 2009 13:18:31 GMT -5
Just fudge their age and lets make them prospects. Next draft is going to suck, isn't it? Ive already added some older spects, I dont want to change ages. I want the ages to be relative.
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jun 9, 2009 13:18:33 GMT -5
yes this should happen, the more talent, the more fun the league is. But I do not mind them coming in through the draft, could be better.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 9, 2009 13:19:05 GMT -5
Interesting. Couple of ideas. Maybe some of the lower tier franchises can enter a lotto and the 3 winners can offer them contracts but other teams cant? Or the same scenario with all franchises. What constitutes a lower tier franchise? I don't think anyone needs a hand out. The 10 worst franchises all time. Those 10 enter a lotto. 5 teams win and can bid for the player.
|
|
aar
All-Star
Seattle SuperSonics
Posts: 6,306
|
Post by aar on Jun 9, 2009 13:19:13 GMT -5
3 RCs to enter the lotto
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jun 9, 2009 13:19:17 GMT -5
Interesting. Couple of ideas. Maybe some of the lower tier franchises can enter a lotto and the 3 winners can offer them contracts but other teams cant? Or the same scenario with all franchises. What constitutes a lower tier franchise? I don't think anyone needs a hand out. teams that did not get more than 15 wins this season, ie me.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jun 9, 2009 13:19:38 GMT -5
I'd always prefer to have these types added through the draft, even if it is as the expense of realism (ages). Definitely hate any idea that makes it so only certain teams can go after them though (the weaker franchises).
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jun 9, 2009 13:19:56 GMT -5
What constitutes a lower tier franchise? I don't think anyone needs a hand out. The 10 worst franchises all time. Those 10 enter a lotto. 5 teams win and can bid for the player. oh that sucks, half wont even have the money.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jun 9, 2009 13:20:24 GMT -5
What constitutes a lower tier franchise? I don't think anyone needs a hand out. The 10 worst franchises all time. Those 10 enter a lotto. 5 teams win and can bid for the player. Eh, completely hate this idea. If they're going to be FAs, make them FAs and let us try and get cap space.
|
|
Pacman
All-Star
Boston Celtics
2023 & 2031 BBS CHAMPIONS
Posts: 7,370
|
Post by Pacman on Jun 9, 2009 13:20:52 GMT -5
i think my team has been a top 10 worst franchise of all time..
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jun 9, 2009 13:21:26 GMT -5
No. Don't put them in the league. Reasoning? Because at a certain point, it's just bullshit. We don't need all the superstars coming in as FAs and basically randomly changing the balance of BBS. The drafts up to retro sucked, the best player during that period came in as an FA. It just makes absolutely no sense. Once was fine, but as a routine, why would we want succeeding to be about getting lucky? Especially when rebuilding has been so difficult for awhile now.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 9, 2009 13:22:40 GMT -5
Because at a certain point, it's just bullshit. We don't need all the superstars coming in as FAs and basically randomly changing the balance of BBS. The drafts up to retro sucked, the best player during that period came in as an FA. It just makes absolutely no sense. Once was fine, but as a routine, why would we want succeeding to be about getting lucky? Especially when rebuilding has been so difficult for awhile now. I dont have a preference BTW, just easier to make my decision when there is reasoning. Its the same with retro, people say they hate retro, but cant give reasoning. Makes it easy for me to do retro, lol.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jun 9, 2009 13:23:18 GMT -5
And these ideas are sprialing into completely stupidity. We have a draft already. Why are we overloading certain parts of the process? Either tanking teams get too lucky with this, or they get no luck with a shitty file and Willis Reed coming in as an FA? It's unrealistic and ridiculous,
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jun 9, 2009 13:23:34 GMT -5
Because at a certain point, it's just bullshit. We don't need all the superstars coming in as FAs and basically randomly changing the balance of BBS. The drafts up to retro sucked, the best player during that period came in as an FA. It just makes absolutely no sense. Once was fine, but as a routine, why would we want succeeding to be about getting lucky? Especially when rebuilding has been so difficult for awhile now. I do agree with this to a certain extent. If you make them FAs, everybody should have the right to get them. Otherwise put them in the draft and make them what their age should really be... Who really cares how old they are.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 9, 2009 13:23:52 GMT -5
lol
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jun 9, 2009 13:24:36 GMT -5
Because at a certain point, it's just bullshit. We don't need all the superstars coming in as FAs and basically randomly changing the balance of BBS. The drafts up to retro sucked, the best player during that period came in as an FA. It just makes absolutely no sense. Once was fine, but as a routine, why would we want succeeding to be about getting lucky? Especially when rebuilding has been so difficult for awhile now. I dont have a preference BTW, just easier to make my decision when there is reasoning. Its the same with retro, people say they hate retro, but cant give reasoning. Makes it easy for me to do retro, lol. I just hate the FA thing. The Reed thing legitimately upset me a lot. It's leaving too much up to luck. I know the lottery is luck, but not nearly to the extent that FA is. But, I'd like to have them in the league. Either have them as FAs where we can all bid (definitely not a situation where only certain teams can bid), or lets make them 22 and get them into the shitty next draft class. My two cents.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jun 9, 2009 13:24:51 GMT -5
yes this should happen, the more talent, the more fun the league is. But I do not mind them coming in through the draft, could be better. You're being a huge hypocrite right now.
|
|