|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Jun 29, 2009 15:06:07 GMT -5
if we all judged people's value based off of one season or series even there would be a million overvalued players in the NBA Jerome James FTW yeah exactly... I'm not saying Brooks and Landry are going to be the next Jerome James but damn they had one good series they are great back-ups. I would not trade Ricky Rubio or any similar youth for two really good role players.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 29, 2009 15:07:19 GMT -5
Knicks obviously wouldve dealt Hill for both.
Shit even the Wolves would be better off with Landry and Brooks, and Curry instead of Flynn.
Jefferson Love Landry Smith Gomes Brewer Curry Brooks
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Jun 29, 2009 15:07:25 GMT -5
Ya but Brook and Landry are solid players. James never was. yeah but he had a really good 2004-2005 playoffs series and that skyrocketed his value.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Jun 29, 2009 15:07:55 GMT -5
Knicks obviously wouldve dealt Hill for both. Shit even the Wolves would be better off with Landry and Brooks, and Curry instead of Flynn. Jefferson Love Landry Smith Gomes Brewer Curry Brooks lol there's no way the Knicks would deal for ANOTHER undersized PG and ANOTHER undersized 4. You're insane.
|
|
|
Post by Apollo on Jun 29, 2009 15:07:59 GMT -5
Raptors would've done it. Rockets were obviously only targetting Rubio.
Anyways, yeah the article is of course valid, but the good thing is T-Mac and Yao are off the books in 2010. If Yao's done, then it's a good thing to know now, because then we can be major players in the 2010 FA.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Jun 29, 2009 15:08:54 GMT -5
Raptors would've done it. Rockets were obviously only targetting Rubio. Anyways, yeah the article is of course valid, but the good thing is T-Mac and Yao are off the books in 2010. If Yao's done, then it's a good thing to know now, because then we can be major players in the 2010 FA. No, they're not off the books Yao has a player option and he'd be stupid to leave 17 mill on the table knowing his career is over.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 29, 2009 15:09:19 GMT -5
Knicks obviously wouldve dealt Hill for both. Shit even the Wolves would be better off with Landry and Brooks, and Curry instead of Flynn. Jefferson Love Landry Smith Gomes Brewer Curry Brooks lol there's no way the Knicks would deal for ANOTHER undersized PG and ANOTHER undersized 4. You're insane. When all youre giving up is Hill I think its a no brainer. The Warriors were very happy to add the 7th pick to the Amare deal because it was probably gonna be Hill. Hill has much less value then the top 5 or 6 spects in this draft.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Jun 29, 2009 15:10:47 GMT -5
lol there's no way the Knicks would deal for ANOTHER undersized PG and ANOTHER undersized 4. You're insane. When all youre giving up is Hill I think its a no brainer. The Warriors were very happy to add the 7th pick to the Amare deal because it was probably gonna be Hill. Hill has much less value then the top 5 or 6 spects in this draft. come on, if Landry and Brooks were so amazing why did the Rockets look to deal them immediately after the playoff series with the Lakers? Here's the reason there value will NEVER be higher than it was at that moment.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jun 29, 2009 15:12:05 GMT -5
Brooks was sick in the playoffs and Landry s a good player, but no way their value is nearly as high as this thread thinks.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Jun 29, 2009 15:13:49 GMT -5
mark echoed my statement.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jun 29, 2009 15:15:56 GMT -5
I do like Landry a lot though. Such an efficient player. Perfect for the Nets at the 4 right now.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 29, 2009 15:16:45 GMT -5
They are both efficient players, that's why thy have value.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Jun 29, 2009 15:20:52 GMT -5
not the sort of value you have been giving them in this thread.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 29, 2009 15:22:19 GMT -5
I still think most teams would rather have these 2 players then anyone picked at 6, 8, 9, 10 and with Rubio being a home 5 as well.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 29, 2009 15:22:59 GMT -5
Id certainly rather have Brooks and Landry then Hill who is probably the player the Warriors shouldve ended up with.
|
|
|
Post by Apollo on Jun 29, 2009 15:30:49 GMT -5
Some confuse FBB value with NBA value!
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 29, 2009 15:35:28 GMT -5
Funny thing is the Wolves didnt even offer Landry, they offered Battier. Battier is awesome, but the Wolves are still far from competing so he isnt needed.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Jun 29, 2009 15:37:12 GMT -5
another bench player, solid.
|
|
|
Post by Apollo on Jun 29, 2009 16:03:53 GMT -5
Raptors would've done it. Rockets were obviously only targetting Rubio. Anyways, yeah the article is of course valid, but the good thing is T-Mac and Yao are off the books in 2010. If Yao's done, then it's a good thing to know now, because then we can be major players in the 2010 FA. No, they're not off the books Yao has a player option and he'd be stupid to leave 17 mill on the table knowing his career is over. If he's done medically, he's done.
|
|
Play
All-Star
Los Angeles Clippers
Posts: 5,702
|
Post by Play on Jun 29, 2009 16:59:51 GMT -5
nice. now warriors don't have to deal with him next year. small ball ftw. stfu, you fucking retard....the warriors suck...small ball ftl.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 29, 2009 17:17:41 GMT -5
nice. now warriors don't have to deal with him next year. small ball ftw. stfu, you fucking retard....the warriors suck...small ball ftl. Wont be so small with Randolph at PF.
|
|
Play
All-Star
Los Angeles Clippers
Posts: 5,702
|
Post by Play on Jun 29, 2009 17:20:00 GMT -5
stfu, you fucking retard....the warriors suck...small ball ftl. Wont be so small with Randolph at PF. hes like 200lbs....no chance at pf
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Jun 29, 2009 17:24:12 GMT -5
LOL @ RANDOLPH
|
|
Pacman
All-Star
Boston Celtics
2023 & 2031 BBS CHAMPIONS
Posts: 7,370
|
Post by Pacman on Jun 29, 2009 17:24:51 GMT -5
nice. now warriors don't have to deal with him next year. small ball ftw. stfu, you fucking retard....the warriors suck...small ball ftl. rofl. knew this was coming.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 29, 2009 17:40:44 GMT -5
Wont be so small with Randolph at PF. hes like 200lbs....no chance at pf k.
|
|