|
Post by Rocky on Aug 19, 2009 10:43:09 GMT -5
This argument is always so stupid and always such a waste of time. Every season someone says this about the West. Every season the East is better top to bottom. It doesn't matter at all. Maybe this year the West is better, but I don't see it at all. If we're going to talk about any of the western teams, I don't see how a Wizards team that has beaten me twice, beaten the 76ers, the Bucks, the Pacers, and DESTROYED Skillz is not involved. Again, it's such a stupid thing to bother arguing, but you're underrating the Bucks and especially the 76ers because of a slow start, and overrating the West starts. But seriously, who gives a shit.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Aug 19, 2009 10:52:45 GMT -5
The Knicks are a sick defensive team but have a shitload of weakness. Mike Riordan is playing 20 minutes a game for them. The Bucks are always a regular season team, and they're not that great anymore. Rollins and Max are the shit but the rest of that team is eh. The Nets are really balanced, could be a title contender maybe. The 76ers? Top 4? No chance. We've beaten them twice already. I would put the Rebels and Blazers above some of those teams and us when we're healthy. Lakers maybe even too. You start Daniel Johnson at the 4. Is he even C defense there? I mean if you want to talk about weaknesses, they're in the West. You start 2 C defenders and don't combine to get 20 ppg from your bigs. The Blazers have a shitty SG and the worst depth of any good team. The Rebels start two C defenders, one B- defender, and give up 120 PPG. I'd definitely take the Sixers and Bucks over them. Maniac's team is as great as it's always been, and Jordan's team is nasty, too. And if you guys think you're as good as the Nets, forget it.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 19, 2009 10:56:29 GMT -5
The Knicks are a sick defensive team but have a shitload of weakness. Mike Riordan is playing 20 minutes a game for them. The Bucks are always a regular season team, and they're not that great anymore. Rollins and Max are the shit but the rest of that team is eh. The Nets are really balanced, could be a title contender maybe. The 76ers? Top 4? No chance. We've beaten them twice already. I would put the Rebels and Blazers above some of those teams and us when we're healthy. Lakers maybe even too. You start Daniel Johnson at the 4. Is he even C defense there? I mean if you want to talk about weaknesses, they're in the West. You start 2 C defenders and don't combine to get 20 ppg from your bigs. The Blazers have a shitty SG and the worst depth of any good team. The Rebels start two C defenders, one B- defender, and give up 120 PPG. I'd definitely take the Sixers and Bucks over them. Maniac's team is as great as it's always been, and Jordan's team is nasty, too. And if you guys think you're as good as the Nets, forget it. Daniel Johnson is listed at PF, lol. We start 2 C defenders but we're also a ridiclous offensive team. We were averaging 135 ppg before mercier got hurt. "And if you guys think you're as good as the Nets, forget it."....lol. Nets are really good but they are by no stretch far and away the best team in the league, at all.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 19, 2009 10:57:17 GMT -5
I think the East is better at the top by a bit but the West has far more depth. I don't think the Magic would be a top 10-11 team in the west
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Aug 19, 2009 10:58:21 GMT -5
Yeah, they're just a lot better than you are. How often has it worked out when guys say something like, yeah, we have two C defenders but our offense is great?
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Aug 19, 2009 11:00:23 GMT -5
I think the East is better at the top by a bit but the West has far more depth. I don't think the Magic would be a top 10-11 team in the west bballsim56.com/BBS/boxes/7-1.html
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 19, 2009 11:01:13 GMT -5
Yeah, they're just a lot better than you are. How often has it worked out when guys say something like, yeah, we have two C defenders but our offense is great? It works if you have a truly great offense.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 19, 2009 11:02:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Aug 19, 2009 11:02:15 GMT -5
Yeah, they're just a lot better than you are. How often has it worked out when guys say something like, yeah, we have two C defenders but our offense is great? It works if you have a truly great offense. You're 13-10 and giving up 115 PPG. I'd reevaluate.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Aug 19, 2009 11:02:27 GMT -5
I don't know if my team is the best in the league but I also wouldn't put any team over it right now. Who knows. People will get injuried, and St. Cloud will inevitably go to the finals again. So whoever has him should be good.
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Aug 19, 2009 11:02:47 GMT -5
The Wolves being the 3rd best team in the West kind of kills any debate
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 19, 2009 11:03:34 GMT -5
It works if you have a truly great offense. You're 13-10 and giving up 115 PPG. I'd reevaluate. We're 12-4 with Mercier and averaging 130 ppg with him. I'm good
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 19, 2009 11:04:24 GMT -5
The Pacers being the 2nd best team in the East kind of kills any debate someone cool me off!
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Aug 19, 2009 11:04:44 GMT -5
I agree that it makes no difference that Highlander missed both games. Good point.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 19, 2009 11:04:54 GMT -5
The Wolves actually have a sick team, BTW.
Wizards might be my favorite team in the East, didn't even see them
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 19, 2009 11:05:26 GMT -5
I agree that it makes no difference that Highlander missed both games. Good point. that's a damper
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Aug 19, 2009 11:06:16 GMT -5
I agree that it makes no difference that Highlander missed both games. Good point. that's a damper
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Aug 19, 2009 11:07:03 GMT -5
btw, mark, i worked out at kayla's y yesterday. really makes you realize how shitty our y is
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Aug 19, 2009 11:08:10 GMT -5
btw, mark, i worked out at kayla's y yesterday. really makes you realize how shitty our y is how high did the DBs go up? it's crazy how bad ours is
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Aug 19, 2009 11:10:04 GMT -5
btw, moral of the story is who gives a shit what conference is better 15 games in
|
|
|
Post by Johnny "B. Good" Stamos on Aug 19, 2009 11:10:14 GMT -5
4-0 nice. Don't know how but we are just coming out with wins. Our defense is actually pretty good and Love and Joffer and carrying the team right now. Not bad.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Aug 19, 2009 11:10:20 GMT -5
btw, moral of the story is who gives a shit what conference is better 15 games in it's the east though
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Aug 19, 2009 11:11:07 GMT -5
our y sucks too
|
|
|
Post by Johnny "B. Good" Stamos on Aug 19, 2009 11:11:15 GMT -5
LOLZ we are in first? NOW THAT aint right
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Aug 19, 2009 11:11:19 GMT -5
btw, mark, i worked out at kayla's y yesterday. really makes you realize how shitty our y is how high did the DBs go up? it's crazy how bad ours is oh, way, way higher. i don't remember the number. i'm going tomorrow and i'll tell you but it's way above 75. the disparity in quantity was nuts. there was nothing they didn't like double us up in, and they had better everything. also tons of shit that we just don't have. is darien like that?
|
|