|
Post by Gossip Girl on Oct 30, 2009 14:57:06 GMT -5
Extra cap, a +3, and a player gone. Win-Win-Win situation.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Oct 30, 2009 14:59:40 GMT -5
was there ever a mention of this +3 before Spencer made this thread?
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Oct 30, 2009 15:00:13 GMT -5
Didn't hear of one
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Oct 30, 2009 15:05:57 GMT -5
yeah so thats why this is BS
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Oct 30, 2009 15:07:04 GMT -5
Spencer always does what he thinks is best for the league
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Oct 30, 2009 15:12:25 GMT -5
good points by play
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Oct 30, 2009 15:16:47 GMT -5
Everybody loves Brandon.
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Oct 30, 2009 15:17:05 GMT -5
Brendan? I don't fuck know
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Oct 30, 2009 15:44:47 GMT -5
Choo Choo, here comes the Clue Train, last stop is Play. No shit we wanted some of our players gone. I would have shit my pants if he took Brock and I'm sure Nanz would have felt the same way if he took Joffer! LMAO, you're missing the point...I would have been happy if Maniac took Jenkins....but why should I get compensation for him taking Jenkins? Sixers left both of his player unprotected, so its obvious that he didn't want them....Maniac selected Block....so now the sixers get a +3 to add to Dr. J...lol doesn't make sense. Sixers come away with an extra 5mil in cap and a +3 for a player they didn't want in the first place. he's right
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Oct 30, 2009 15:45:21 GMT -5
these guys were unprotected for a reason. most of them were guys their teams wanted gone
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Oct 30, 2009 15:48:00 GMT -5
I wanted to keep Petrie. I deserve my +3.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Oct 30, 2009 15:48:15 GMT -5
LMAO, you're missing the point...I would have been happy if Maniac took Jenkins....but why should I get compensation for him taking Jenkins? Sixers left both of his player unprotected, so its obvious that he didn't want them....Maniac selected Block....so now the sixers get a +3 to add to Dr. J...lol doesn't make sense. Sixers come away with an extra 5mil in cap and a +3 for a player they didn't want in the first place. he's right
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Oct 30, 2009 15:55:06 GMT -5
Haha, Spence, every player I took blows.
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Oct 30, 2009 15:56:49 GMT -5
Haha, Spence, every player I took blows. Nice job by you getting really close to 15 mil though. Also, Sutton is a very good simmer for his ratings.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Oct 30, 2009 16:17:06 GMT -5
I hope you and mark aren't being sarcastic I was under the impression you needed to protect 7 no matter what if I knew i was going to get a plus three I would have only protected like 3 players
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Oct 30, 2009 16:21:40 GMT -5
I hope you and mark aren't being sarcastic I was under the impression you needed to protect 7 no matter what if I knew i was going to get a plus three I would have only protected like 3 players no, i agree with you
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Oct 30, 2009 16:23:47 GMT -5
I hope you and mark aren't being sarcastic I was under the impression you needed to protect 7 no matter what if I knew i was going to get a plus three I would have only protected like 3 players I'm not being sarcastic. When I initially posted that the idea was good I wasn't really thinking about who the teams lost. I thought it made sense that they should get compensated for losing players off of their team. But yeah, these are guys no one gave a shit about.
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Oct 30, 2009 16:34:36 GMT -5
Spence definitely said you could protect less than 7.(I protected 3) It was in the Idea, Expansion thread. Didn't say anything about a +3 though.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Oct 30, 2009 16:35:15 GMT -5
I hope you and mark aren't being sarcastic I was under the impression you needed to protect 7 no matter what if I knew i was going to get a plus three I would have only protected like 3 players I'm not being sarcastic. When I initially posted that the idea was good I wasn't really thinking about who the teams lost. I thought it made sense that they should get compensated for losing players off of their team. But yeah, these are guys no one gave a shit about. I WANTED TO KEEP PETRIE
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Oct 30, 2009 16:36:47 GMT -5
Petrie has okay ratings, sims like pooh. He was a lotto pick though, so I guess anything could happen
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Oct 30, 2009 16:39:46 GMT -5
cool stuff bro
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Oct 30, 2009 16:53:24 GMT -5
Spence definitely said you could protect less than 7.(I protected 3) It was in the Idea, Expansion thread. Didn't say anything about a +3 though. Yeah I read that too but I'm almost 75% sure he later clarified that you must protect a min of 7 players no matter what
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Oct 30, 2009 16:54:38 GMT -5
I'm not being sarcastic. When I initially posted that the idea was good I wasn't really thinking about who the teams lost. I thought it made sense that they should get compensated for losing players off of their team. But yeah, these are guys no one gave a shit about. I WANTED TO KEEP PETRIE No need to yell at me Please apologize
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 30, 2009 17:56:01 GMT -5
I decided that because the expansion was short notice that teams that lost a player would get a +3. I didnt say anything because I wanted it to be a surprise. Boy, what a nice surprise huh?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 30, 2009 17:56:50 GMT -5
Spence definitely said you could protect less than 7.(I protected 3) It was in the Idea, Expansion thread. Didn't say anything about a +3 though. Yeah I read that too but I'm almost 75% sure he later clarified that you must protect a min of 7 players no matter what Dont think I did since most teams didnt have 7 players to protect. Actually my initial list I posted had all your players outside of GIlmore on it.
|
|