|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:00:45 GMT -5
can't you change the draft order? kinda guess-stimate where the picks would land? I cant change the draft order. Id need to trade all the picks around. |
|
Matt
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 1,899
|
Post by Matt on Nov 26, 2009 2:01:11 GMT -5
Understandable, but I just don't like changing the draft concepts. Plus I need 40 and SVH didn't do too well with the Knicks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:01:44 GMT -5
Understandable, but I just don't like changing the draft concepts. Plus I need 40 and SVH didn't do too well with the Knicks. Changing the draft? |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:04:07 GMT -5
Id need to sim in a way that the results were similar.
|
|
Matt
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 1,899
|
Post by Matt on Nov 26, 2009 2:04:10 GMT -5
You just said something about creation draft from 2009 and gm created players later on. Don't like it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:04:43 GMT -5
Also, doing all the trade. There are like 30. With all of the transactions. the cuts, etc. Such a pain in the ass.
|
|
Matt
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 1,899
|
Post by Matt on Nov 26, 2009 2:05:23 GMT -5
A woman would abort everything and do something drastic, a man would fix it and keep a good thing going. Be a man spencer, be a man.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:05:27 GMT -5
idk. Nothing sounds ideal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny "B. Good" Stamos on Nov 26, 2009 2:05:44 GMT -5
must of the transactions are moving players and you don't really have to do that. I think it would be easier if you just trade the picks at the end
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:05:47 GMT -5
A woman would abort everything and do something drastic, a man would fix it and keep a good thing going. Be a man spencer, be a man. Itd be twice as much work though. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:06:10 GMT -5
I think wed need to live with the results at the end.
|
|
Matt
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 1,899
|
Post by Matt on Nov 26, 2009 2:06:12 GMT -5
Also, doing all the trade. There are like 30. With all of the transactions. the cuts, etc. Such a pain in the ass. Wheres your fiance at? Some pussy would make things better for you right now. |
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Nov 26, 2009 2:06:36 GMT -5
sleep on it sdog
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:08:41 GMT -5
And Id have to re do the draft class.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny "B. Good" Stamos on Nov 26, 2009 2:12:56 GMT -5
it really sucks but you have to fight thru it spence!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Nov 26, 2009 2:15:55 GMT -5
what happened, fill me in
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:22:57 GMT -5
what happened, fill me in League file is gone. It was just empty. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:23:22 GMT -5
We could do a creation draft from Day 1 of this season. that might be kinda cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny "B. Good" Stamos on Nov 26, 2009 2:24:14 GMT -5
If we are gonna have a creation draft we might as well just re-stary
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:24:20 GMT -5
Im leaning towards a restart. 1975. Creation draft. Expanded history html. Maybe trying to create a hall of fame where we vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:24:49 GMT -5
If we are gonna have a creation draft we might as well just re-stary I thought it might be cool to have a creation draft with the players currently in the league. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2009 2:25:48 GMT -5
I like the idea of implementing rules from Day 1. I like the idea of a HOF. I like the idea of increased history html.
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Nov 26, 2009 2:25:55 GMT -5
Im leaning towards a restart. 1975. Creation draft. Expanded history html. Maybe trying to create a hall of fame where we vote. 1990! |
|
Matt
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 1,899
|
Post by Matt on Nov 26, 2009 2:26:08 GMT -5
If we are gonna have a creation draft we might as well just re-stary I thought it might be cool to have a creation draft with the players currently in the league. ahh fuck it, im in. |
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Nov 26, 2009 2:26:24 GMT -5
MODERN FTW
|
|
