Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 17, 2008 17:12:18 GMT -5
I was implying making the rule more complex because it was pretty clear cut and simple. You were pretty clear you wanted to hear nothing of the sorts and if I raised issue further it would come back as Dave bitching about a rule. No one cared enough to raise issue or pose questions so the rule was as is. Spence you are always about setting precedents and keeping things even and fair. Well teams adjusted to this rule to follow and comply to it. Why should others not be held to the standard now. You said sign a guy to a large FA deal and follow it this shouldn't be an issue. As you stated, "I dont want there to be stipulations for this rule. Its pretty simple no need to make it more complex." LOL. When I said I didn't want it more complex, I was talking about the winning % idea you started to propose. I don't mind opening up things for conversation if they don't make sense. It doesn't make sense for the Hard Cap to get 24 hours and the Minimum Cap to have nothing. If anything right now the rule doesn't make sense, and the precedent would be for it to be 24 hours. My rules aren't perfect. I make mistakes, and I am more then happy to question myself if I feel as though it isn't right as is. You remember when the hard cap wasn't 24hrs? I tried to buy out a contract the last day of the season and I would have been in compliance of 24hrs and we changed the rule to if you went over you were over so why is the rule changed back. Too many times we change rules and too many times we don't. I don't like inconsistency especially when I make a very strong effort to follow to the rules to a T and because someone else is careless and fucks up they get off the hook.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 17, 2008 17:12:22 GMT -5
Also, Baron Davis> you.
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Mar 17, 2008 17:14:21 GMT -5
He got lucky. It happens. I'd say, after FA, just take a quick look at the team salary info page (the one that shows the amount of cap space left). If a team has more then 13 Mil in cap, they are under the minimum salary rule. Give them 24 hrs then.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 17, 2008 17:15:12 GMT -5
LOL. When I said I didn't want it more complex, I was talking about the winning % idea you started to propose. I don't mind opening up things for conversation if they don't make sense. It doesn't make sense for the Hard Cap to get 24 hours and the Minimum Cap to have nothing. If anything right now the rule doesn't make sense, and the precedent would be for it to be 24 hours. My rules aren't perfect. I make mistakes, and I am more then happy to question myself if I feel as though it isn't right as is. You remember when the hard cap wasn't 24hrs? I tried to buy out a contract the last day of the season and I would have been in compliance of 24hrs and we changed the rule to if you went over you were over so why is the rule changed back. Too many times we change rules and too many times we don't. I don't like inconsistency especially when I make a very strong effort to follow to the rules to a T and because someone else is careless and fucks up they get off the hook. Hard Cap has been the same since we started this league. How things were in the last thing, or what rules were in the last thing, dont mean much to me right now. Im concerned with whats best for the league. Bottom line, you were more concerned with the amount of the Minimum Cap, or changing the Minimum Cap to better suit your teams needs. You never brought up anything about how important it was that no time be given to a team under the Minimum Cap. I think part of you wants consistency, but that part of you isn't taking into consideration that consistency would be to give 24 hours. I think you want Haberman to get the punishment because you guys are arguing.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 17, 2008 17:15:39 GMT -5
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 17, 2008 17:18:44 GMT -5
You remember when the hard cap wasn't 24hrs? I tried to buy out a contract the last day of the season and I would have been in compliance of 24hrs and we changed the rule to if you went over you were over so why is the rule changed back. Too many times we change rules and too many times we don't. I don't like inconsistency especially when I make a very strong effort to follow to the rules to a T and because someone else is careless and fucks up they get off the hook. Hard Cap has been the same since we started this league. How things were in the last thing, or what rules were in the last thing, dont mean much to me right now. Im concerned with whats best for the league. Bottom line, you were more concerned with the amount of the Minimum Cap, or changing the Minimum Cap to better suit your teams needs. You never brought up anything about how important it was that no time be given to a team under the Minimum Cap. I think part of you wants consistency, but that part of you isn't taking into consideration that consistency would be to give 24 hours. I think you want Haberman to get the punishment because you guys are arguing. I adjusted to the rule because you wouldn't even debate it. I didn't bring it up because you were very stern in your words you didn't want to discuss anything. You were pretty clear you wanted it simple so why bring up anything? You didn't allow me too. I didn't even know Haberman was infracted by this until he brought it up that he was. My position hasn't changed.
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 17, 2008 17:19:30 GMT -5
If Haberman gets off the hook for fucking up every team that complied should be rewarded if you want to be truly fair.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Mar 17, 2008 17:21:48 GMT -5
He wanted it to be fair, so he put it to vote. Duh!
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Mar 17, 2008 17:22:31 GMT -5
I didn't know aaron went over
he shouldnt be allowed to have a higher pick than me in the draft for this
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 17, 2008 17:23:11 GMT -5
If Haberman gets off the hook for fucking up every team that complied should be rewarded if you want to be truly fair. How would I reward people for following a rule? This has nothing to do with Haberman. I would've re opened this no matter who broke the rule, because my first reaction is, "I should've worded it more clearly." When you and Aaron questioned the rule, you questioned the amount. I have no problem with the amount. Today i realized for the first time that it sucks to go under 30 through the process of trading and not get a chance to go back over. I didn't think about the fact that teams may go back under during the season, so when it happened I was caught by surprise.
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 17, 2008 17:23:26 GMT -5
Bonus RC to any player any age 1-5 random pts to everyone who complied to the minimum salary rule
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 17, 2008 17:24:48 GMT -5
Bonus RC to any player any age 1-5 random pts to everyone who complied to the minimum salary rule Everyone complied Dave, lol.
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 17, 2008 17:25:42 GMT -5
Bonus RC to any player any age 1-5 random pts to everyone who complied to the minimum salary rule Everyone complied Dave, lol. except haberman so if he get the get of jail free card what do we get?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 17, 2008 17:27:21 GMT -5
Everyone complied Dave, lol. except haberman so if he get the get of jail free card what do we get? You get me not being in a pissy mood because you didn't make a big deal out of this. ;D
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 17, 2008 17:29:48 GMT -5
except haberman so if he get the get of jail free card what do we get? You get me not being in a pissy mood because you didn't make a big deal out of this. ;D So bonus rc thread should we keep it here or start a fresh one ;D
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 17, 2008 17:34:39 GMT -5
You get me not being in a pissy mood because you didn't make a big deal out of this. ;D So bonus rc thread should we keep it here or start a fresh one ;D 1 + 3 increase for every team. Wont count as an RC uprgrade. Must affect a ratings that is C+ or lower. In this thread. Minimum Cap rule now includes a 24 hour time limit.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 17, 2008 17:42:04 GMT -5
Im a control freak, tis true.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 17, 2008 17:42:25 GMT -5
POST FUCKERS!@
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Mar 17, 2008 17:45:42 GMT -5
Shard - Defensive Rebounding
|
|
|
Post by Aaron2344 on Mar 17, 2008 17:46:46 GMT -5
AK - defensive rebounding
|
|
Scott
Starter
Cleveland Cavaliers
Cavs GM
Posts: 2,662
|
Post by Scott on Mar 17, 2008 17:47:12 GMT -5
Dermarr Johnson-Speed
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Mar 17, 2008 17:47:38 GMT -5
Jrich- midrange
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 17, 2008 17:47:55 GMT -5
so whats the time limit to get this RC in? I don't want any issuees
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 17, 2008 17:48:36 GMT -5
so whats the time limit to get this RC in? I don't want any issuees One minute before you post yours is the time limit.
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Mar 17, 2008 17:49:09 GMT -5
Sofoklis Schortsanitis - Off Rebounding
|
|