Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 22, 2008 15:56:28 GMT -5
1. The rules state you can only upgrade a player must be under 25 which would make me to believe a player 25yrs old is ineligible. I think a player 25 yrs old should be eligible as if a player is a senior and comes out of the draft at 23 he will only be able to be upgraded twice. I think he should have the opportunity to be upgraded 3 times.
2. We should also adopt the 1 yr out of high school rule when it comes into play as it did in real life. I think this will really increase the realism of the sim.
|
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Mar 22, 2008 16:04:13 GMT -5
i thought you could upgrade guys at age 25
1 year out of high school rule is cool with me
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 22, 2008 16:14:38 GMT -5
i thought you could upgrade guys at age 25 1 year out of high school rule is cool with me I always thought we could too but when I read the rules today its worded otherwise |
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 22, 2008 17:57:41 GMT -5
Uhhh..
I would guess '25 and under' means they could be 25, or, well...under?
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 22, 2008 18:00:33 GMT -5
brain fart on my part.....
-Players must be under 25.
Thats what the rule states. I was unclear in my first post
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 23, 2008 0:31:58 GMT -5
second idea is alright. under 25 i think is good the way it is.
But the idea of 1 year in college is cool.
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 23, 2008 0:39:26 GMT -5
second idea is alright. under 25 i think is good the way it is. But the idea of 1 year in college is cool. but it never was under 25 its something that mysteriously changed in this league |
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 23, 2008 0:47:37 GMT -5
second idea is alright. under 25 i think is good the way it is. But the idea of 1 year in college is cool. but it never was under 25 its something that mysteriously changed in this league i thought it was always this. do not remember being 25 and under. could be wrong though. |
|
A2J
Starter
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,800
|
Post by A2J on Mar 23, 2008 9:24:43 GMT -5
I would prefer 25 and under ... because it means more RCs for Jefferson and Dunleavy. Really, that's my main motivation, I'm not hiding it.
But also because I think it's a better age to set this at. 25 is the turning point from developing to producing in my eyes, and it just seems like a better age to cap this at as opposed to 24. Either way is no real skin off my back though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 23, 2008 11:18:57 GMT -5
I want to limit the amount of players eligible for RCs so under 25 is fine. I had already intended to implement the 1 year of college rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 23, 2008 12:21:47 GMT -5
under 25 is perfect.
|
|
|
|
Post by lock on Mar 24, 2008 2:58:26 GMT -5
Like the 2nd rule
|
|
