|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 31, 2008 19:38:26 GMT -5
Vote.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 31, 2008 19:40:28 GMT -5
Sorry Spencer made these rules after this, so STFU and go wack it.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Mar 31, 2008 19:43:29 GMT -5
BS, since the rule is new i say don't allow the trade back, but if it was an existing rule i'd vote for the first option
Shouldn't go through
|
|
|
Post by noves on Mar 31, 2008 19:53:20 GMT -5
Let it go through.
Is it fucked up and BS? Yeah, but it was a result of the things Dave did, and the plan was created before the rule was put into place, so just let it go in, and just strictly prohibit it from happening in the future.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 31, 2008 19:54:57 GMT -5
Let it go through. Is it fucked up and BS? Yeah, but it was a result of the things Dave did, and the plan was created before the rule was put into place, so just let it go in, and just strictly prohibit it from happening in the future. I prefer that people are punished for crooked workings.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 31, 2008 19:55:12 GMT -5
Let it go through. Is it fucked up and BS? Yeah, but it was a result of the things Dave did, and the plan was created before the rule was put into place, so just let it go in, and just strictly prohibit it from happening in the future. Someone reasonable. You people need to realize I didn't try to hide anything. I went to Spencer and I told him, which is why he implemented the new rules LAST week. That was everyone's chance to chime in, not a week later. If I never said anything to Spencer, or made a trade thread sarcastically saying "CHEATERS" trade, no one probably would have even noticed.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 31, 2008 19:56:30 GMT -5
You shouldn't have been such a douchebag about it then. Hell, you should be punished for mockingly putting 'cheaters' in the title of the trade. I'm sure showing up Spence was the smart thing to do.
|
|
GMGreggor
All-Star
Houston Rockets
Posts: 5,726
|
Post by GMGreggor on Mar 31, 2008 19:57:31 GMT -5
Let it go through. Is it fucked up and BS? Yeah, but it was a result of the things Dave did, and the plan was created before the rule was put into place, so just let it go in, and just strictly prohibit it from happening in the future. I prefer that people are punished for crooked workings. I'm starting to like this guy.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 31, 2008 19:58:33 GMT -5
You shouldn't have been such a douchebag about it then. Hell, you should be punished for mockingly putting 'cheaters' in the title of the trade. I'm sure showing up Spence was the smart thing to do. Hmm let's see... I've been with Spencer for over what is it 4 years now and other than DJ and Mark who've been about the same time... no one's been in BBS longer. So you really think he doesn't know my "antics" by now, please.
|
|
|
Post by noves on Mar 31, 2008 19:58:43 GMT -5
I dislike Martinez as much as anyone, I just don't think that punishment is necessary, considering he told Spence previously.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 31, 2008 19:59:41 GMT -5
I don't see why him telling Spence should make a difference. The rest of the league, minus a few here and there, have agreed that this is bullshit. Majority should rule on this one.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 31, 2008 20:00:17 GMT -5
I don't see why him telling Spence should make a difference. The rest of the league, minus a few here and there, have agreed that this is bullshit. Majority should rule on this one. Why didn't you do that a week ago? Why now?
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 31, 2008 20:01:17 GMT -5
I don't see why him telling Spence should make a difference. The rest of the league, minus a few here and there, have agreed that this is bullshit. Majority should rule on this one. Why didn't you do that a week ago? Why now? Because I didn't notice any of this a week ago. Good call putting 'cheaters' in the title, haha. Caught my attention.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 31, 2008 20:03:02 GMT -5
Why didn't you do that a week ago? Why now? Because I didn't notice any of this a week ago. Good call putting 'cheaters' in the title, haha. Caught my attention. That was the point DUH but guess what, your little rally here is more for your hatred towards me, and guess what, Spencer knows that and nothing will be done. The league moved on a week ago, this is a closed topic, so you're basically knocking on a door no one's going to answer.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 31, 2008 20:03:03 GMT -5
Let it go through. Is it fucked up and BS? Yeah, but it was a result of the things Dave did, and the plan was created before the rule was put into place, so just let it go in, and just strictly prohibit it from happening in the future. And what did Dave have to do with this? Created a bet to which BOTH of them agreed?
|
|
GMGreggor
All-Star
Houston Rockets
Posts: 5,726
|
Post by GMGreggor on Mar 31, 2008 20:03:21 GMT -5
Yea, the first option may be a little extreme.
Maybe make the pick ineligible for top 3 of the lotto though since that does effect other teams that had nothing to do with the bet. Would he have lost as many had he kept Swift?
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 31, 2008 20:04:08 GMT -5
Let it go through. Is it fucked up and BS? Yeah, but it was a result of the things Dave did, and the plan was created before the rule was put into place, so just let it go in, and just strictly prohibit it from happening in the future. And what did Dave have to do with this? Created a bet to which BOTH of them agreed? He made trades for other teams and posted trades for other teams himself. Where was your little crusade for that?
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 31, 2008 20:05:02 GMT -5
Because I didn't notice any of this a week ago. Good call putting 'cheaters' in the title, haha. Caught my attention. That was the point DUH but guess what, your little rally here is more for your hatred towards me, and guess what, Spencer knows that and nothing will be done. The league moved on a week ago, this is a closed topic, so you're basically knocking on a door no one's going to answer. This has nothing to do with you. I'd make an issue out of this no matter who was involved. I talk to play just about every day, probably more than I do with any other GM, and yet I'm not defending him here. This trade sucked both ways and it should be dealt with.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 31, 2008 20:05:50 GMT -5
That was the point DUH but guess what, your little rally here is more for your hatred towards me, and guess what, Spencer knows that and nothing will be done. The league moved on a week ago, this is a closed topic, so you're basically knocking on a door no one's going to answer. This has nothing to do with you. I'd make an issue out of this no matter who was involved. I talk to play just about every day, probably more than I do with any other GM, and yet I'm not defending him here. This trade sucked both ways and it should be dealt with. That's what you are not understanding, it was dealt with a week ago.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 31, 2008 20:07:05 GMT -5
This has nothing to do with you. I'd make an issue out of this no matter who was involved. I talk to play just about every day, probably more than I do with any other GM, and yet I'm not defending him here. This trade sucked both ways and it should be dealt with. That's what you are not understanding, it was dealt with a week ago. I don't think it was dealt with well enough, and apparently a few people agree with me.
|
|
GMGreggor
All-Star
Houston Rockets
Posts: 5,726
|
Post by GMGreggor on Mar 31, 2008 20:07:40 GMT -5
And what did Dave have to do with this? Created a bet to which BOTH of them agreed? He made trades for other teams and posted trades for other teams himself. Where was your little crusade for that? I dont think that was right either Chris but if those GM's agreed to the trade really where is the foul? He should'nt have posted for them but if he wants to suggest trades I dont know how you can police that even though I'm not sure thats unethical. You made the bet Chris, noone else had anything to do with that.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 31, 2008 20:07:47 GMT -5
That's what you are not understanding, it was dealt with a week ago. I don't think it was dealt with well enough, and apparently a few people agree with me. You even posted in that thread... why didn't you bring this up then? That makes absolutely no sense.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 31, 2008 20:09:44 GMT -5
I knew about this for some time, but neither Play nor Martinez told me about it. I think its completely lame and all along was thinking of a "new rule" that would fix this problem. I think this deal makes both GMs look bad, but Im also pretty content with just allowing this deal to happen and then enforcing the tampering rule from here on out.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 31, 2008 20:09:50 GMT -5
He made trades for other teams and posted trades for other teams himself. Where was your little crusade for that? I dont think that was right either Chris but if those GM's agreed to the trade really where is the foul? He should'nt have posted for them but if he wants to suggest trades I dont know how you can police that even though I'm not sure thats unethical. You made the bet Chris, noone else had anything to do with that. I'm not saying what I did was RIGHT, but a)This proposal was brought up to me b)I accepted it, so I was obviously to blame too c)if Dave never traded for other teams, this would probably never have happened to be honest d)People knew about this even before I told Spencer, and they are the ones complaining about it now i.e. Mark e) we didn't break ANY rules
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 31, 2008 20:10:11 GMT -5
I don't think it was dealt with well enough, and apparently a few people agree with me. You even posted in that thread... why didn't you bring this up then? That makes absolutely no sense. The post I made in that thread had nothing to do with either the rule that was made or what it was referencing. Rather, it was just pointing out your hypocritical idiocy.
|
|