|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Aug 2, 2008 16:57:15 GMT -5
Does anyone know how good this sim is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Aug 2, 2008 16:58:14 GMT -5
Link
|
|
|
|
Post by noves on Aug 2, 2008 17:00:17 GMT -5
Pretty good, it's VERY complex. Like, so much more in-depth than FBB it's not even funny.
It's fun for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Aug 2, 2008 17:02:29 GMT -5
Pretty good, it's VERY complex. Like, so much more in-depth than FBB it's not even funny. It's fun for sure. Maybe one day Spence can switch to this. FBB is so outdated |
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Aug 2, 2008 17:02:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by noves on Aug 2, 2008 17:04:29 GMT -5
The problem is, it requires a LOT of time from the commish if people don't have the game(you can export DC's and do your own stuff), and Spence already puts a ton of time into this league.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Aug 2, 2008 17:06:45 GMT -5
The problem is, it requires a LOT of time from the commish if people don't have the game(you can export DC's and do your own stuff), and Spence already puts a ton of time into this league. We should just treat it like GM's treat OOTP then. |
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Aug 2, 2008 17:09:23 GMT -5
I would love to move past FBB if there's actually something better out there. No reason not to.
|
|
Play
All-Star
Los Angeles Clippers
Posts: 5,702
|
Post by Play on Aug 2, 2008 17:10:45 GMT -5
I have it and its pretty good IMO...Every GM would need it though because it basically like a basketball ootp.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Aug 2, 2008 17:15:41 GMT -5
Does it work for Mac's?
|
|
Play
All-Star
Los Angeles Clippers
Posts: 5,702
|
Post by Play on Aug 2, 2008 17:18:20 GMT -5
I don't think so
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Aug 2, 2008 17:19:48 GMT -5
If it does not work for macs than there is no point to get it.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Aug 2, 2008 17:19:58 GMT -5
Also I will sim 5 days.
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Aug 2, 2008 17:23:41 GMT -5
It is more in-depth. Here is a link to an example of some rosters: commissioner.fateback.com/ATLHawks_Ratings.htmlThere is a lot more settings and stuff. The coaching settings then go indepth to talk about how deep you want your coach to use the bench, and then other stuff. |
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Aug 2, 2008 17:26:32 GMT -5
Personally, I wouldn't want this at all. I wouldn't want more in-depth. I like FBB. I like that it's simple and that I DON'T have to do the same things I have to do to keep my OOTP team running. This is an awesome hobby, but eventually I'm going to be too busy to take part in it. I don't want to speed up that process by making an unnecessary change that brings more complexity to the sim.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Aug 2, 2008 17:29:46 GMT -5
I really did not like it when I was in one a while back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Aug 2, 2008 17:33:15 GMT -5
It is more in-depth. Here is a link to an example of some rosters: commissioner.fateback.com/ATLHawks_Ratings.htmlThere is a lot more settings and stuff. The coaching settings then go indepth to talk about how deep you want your coach to use the bench, and then other stuff. This looks like another sim I was in. Exactly the same. OBA or something. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Aug 3, 2008 1:16:03 GMT -5
I have it and its too complex for me to even consider running a sim with it.
|
|
James
Scrub
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,398
|
Post by James on Aug 3, 2008 7:34:53 GMT -5
Personally, I wouldn't want this at all. I wouldn't want more in-depth. I like FBB. I like that it's simple and that I DON'T have to do the same things I have to do to keep my OOTP team running. This is an awesome hobby, but eventually I'm going to be too busy to take part in it. I don't want to speed up that process by making an unnecessary change that brings more complexity to the sim. |
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Aug 3, 2008 10:07:09 GMT -5
I have it and its too complex for me to even consider running a sim with it. \ Yeeee good. |
|
