James
Scrub
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,398
|
Post by James on Mar 11, 2008 3:32:54 GMT -5
Rip Hamilton signing is B+ at best IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Vernon on Mar 11, 2008 8:11:22 GMT -5
Losing out on Odom and Hamilton really sucks but hopefully Jamal Crawford will develop for me.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Mar 11, 2008 13:18:45 GMT -5
Rip Hamilton signing is B+ at best IMO. I could agree with that looking purely at the player, but since it got me Webber, I think A+ is right. I'm just such a better team with Webber than with Rip. It allows Kobe to go back to SG where we know he thrives, and gives me a front-court presence I haven't had in this league. It also moves Battie, who blocked 2 shots per game as a starter last season, to the bench as a backup 4/5. One of my main problems last season was a lack of front-court depth, so this helps to shore that up (as does landing a big with my MLE or LLE).
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Mar 12, 2008 5:36:08 GMT -5
bump
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Mar 12, 2008 10:15:51 GMT -5
50
|
|
aar
All-Star
![*](http://img.basketballforum.com/images/BasketballForum/statusicon/forum_old.gif)
Seattle SuperSonics
Posts: 6,306
|
Post by aar on Mar 12, 2008 13:13:56 GMT -5
Odom and Q had good TCs, so these signings look to be paying off thankfully
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 12, 2008 13:31:14 GMT -5
Odom and Q had good TCs, so these signings look to be paying off thankfully no player with C+ defense should be justified with having that contract. I have SJax with slightly less offensive ratings, and A- defense for half that price.
|
|
Dave
All-Star
![*](http://img.basketballforum.com/images/BasketballForum/statusicon/forum_old.gif)
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 12, 2008 13:34:53 GMT -5
Odom and Q had good TCs, so these signings look to be paying off thankfully no player with C+ defense should be justified with having that contract. I have SJax with slightly less offensive ratings, and A- defense for half that price. If SJax hit the open market his contract would have been much higher. You got him for a great contract where as Q and Odom aren't good contracts they aren't horrid ones either.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 12, 2008 13:40:36 GMT -5
no player with C+ defense should be justified with having that contract. I have SJax with slightly less offensive ratings, and A- defense for half that price. If SJax hit the open market his contract would have been much higher. You got him for a great contract where as Q and Odom aren't good contracts they aren't horrid ones either. I don't think there was more than 1 or 2 teams offering 12+mill for Q.
|
|
A2J
Starter
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,800
|
Post by A2J on Mar 12, 2008 14:02:34 GMT -5
Odom and Q had good TCs, so these signings look to be paying off thankfully no player with C+ defense should be justified with having that contract. I have SJax with slightly less offensive ratings, and A- defense for half that price. What about a guy with like, A- A B- C+ B- C ratings? And Jackson averaged 16.7 PPG on 45.7 FG% with 3.6 TOPG last year. Q averaged 21.4 PPG on 49.4 FG% with 1.5 TOPG. Hardly comparable production.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 12, 2008 14:10:10 GMT -5
no player with C+ defense should be justified with having that contract. I have SJax with slightly less offensive ratings, and A- defense for half that price. What about a guy with like, A- A B- C+ B- C ratings? And Jackson averaged 16.7 PPG on 45.7 FG% with 3.6 TOPG last year. Q averaged 21.4 PPG on 49.4 FG% with 1.5 TOPG. Hardly comparable production. That difference is expected since I clearly said SJax was rated less offensively than Q, and those 3 TOPG was probably due to the fact that I had him playing the 1
|
|
A2J
Starter
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,800
|
Post by A2J on Mar 12, 2008 14:19:24 GMT -5
What about a guy with like, A- A B- C+ B- C ratings? And Jackson averaged 16.7 PPG on 45.7 FG% with 3.6 TOPG last year. Q averaged 21.4 PPG on 49.4 FG% with 1.5 TOPG. Hardly comparable production. That difference is expected since I clearly said SJax was rated less offensively than Q, and those 3 TOPG was probably due to the fact that I had him playing the 1 And I'm saying that Jackson's better defense doesn't make up for the fact that Q is one of the most efficient offensive players in the league.
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
![*](http://img.basketballforum.com/images/BasketballForum/statusicon/forum_old.gif)
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Mar 12, 2008 18:52:16 GMT -5
Odom and Q had good TCs, so these signings look to be paying off thankfully no player with C+ defense should be justified with having that contract. I have SJax with slightly less offensive ratings, and A- defense for half that price. So I guess Melo won't be worth a maxed contract... ![::)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/eyesroll.png)
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Mar 12, 2008 18:58:03 GMT -5
Odom and Q had good TCs, so these signings look to be paying off thankfully no player with C+ defense should be justified with having that contract. I have SJax with slightly less offensive ratings, and A- defense for half that price. Yeah well u also compared SJax to Ray Allen. So u STFU too. ![:D](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/grin.png)
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 12, 2008 20:26:01 GMT -5
no player with C+ defense should be justified with having that contract. I have SJax with slightly less offensive ratings, and A- defense for half that price. So I guess Melo won't be worth a maxed contract... ![::)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/eyesroll.png) you really were born retarded weren't you? If Melo is still a C+ by the time you need to max him, then yeah I'd say he's definitely not worth it because that means he didn't progress for shit.
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
![*](http://img.basketballforum.com/images/BasketballForum/statusicon/forum_old.gif)
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Mar 12, 2008 20:41:43 GMT -5
So I guess Melo won't be worth a maxed contract... ![::)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/eyesroll.png) you really were born retarded weren't you? If Melo is still a C+ by the time you need to max him, then yeah I'd say he's definitely not worth it because that means he didn't progress for shit. Carmelo Anthony SF 19 6'8'' 230 B B B- C B- A You wouldn't max that right now fucktard? Even if he didn't get better than C+ defense, you wouldn't max something like A- A- B C+ B in the future? ![::)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/eyesroll.png)
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Mar 12, 2008 20:45:51 GMT -5
you really were born retarded weren't you? If Melo is still a C+ by the time you need to max him, then yeah I'd say he's definitely not worth it because that means he didn't progress for shit. Carmelo Anthony SF 19 6'8'' 230 B B B- C B- A You wouldn't max that right now fucktard? Even if he didn't get better than C+ defense, you wouldn't max something like A- A- B C+ B in the future? ![::)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/eyesroll.png) You'd be an absolute idiot if you maxed out B B B- C B- A.
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
![*](http://img.basketballforum.com/images/BasketballForum/statusicon/forum_old.gif)
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Mar 12, 2008 21:06:14 GMT -5
Carmelo Anthony SF 19 6'8'' 230 B B B- C B- A
If this was going to be in FA next season, I'd max it, for sure.
You're an absolute idiot if you didn't.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Mar 12, 2008 21:08:23 GMT -5
Carmelo Anthony SF 19 6'8'' 230 B B B- C B- A If this was going to be in FA next season, I'd max it, for sure. You're an absolute idiot if you didn't. Some of us don't value C defense. The only reason he'd get maxed is potential. That's it.
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 12, 2008 21:08:52 GMT -5
what if his name was bob turner would you still max him
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
![*](http://img.basketballforum.com/images/BasketballForum/statusicon/forum_old.gif)
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Mar 12, 2008 21:10:05 GMT -5
what if his name was bob turner would you still max him If he was 19, and 6-8 230, yes.
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 12, 2008 21:12:53 GMT -5
bust!
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
![*](http://img.basketballforum.com/images/BasketballForum/statusicon/forum_old.gif)
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Mar 12, 2008 21:47:02 GMT -5
Lol, well what kind of sick name is Bob Turner? Seriously ![8-)](http://forums.lakersground.net/images/smiles/icon_lol.gif)
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 12, 2008 21:57:33 GMT -5
Lol, well what kind of sick name is Bob Turner? Seriously ![8-)](http://forums.lakersground.net/images/smiles/icon_lol.gif) haha off top of my head. sounds like a car salesmen.
|
|