|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 9, 2009 2:25:45 GMT -5
Scott takes his roster and his owed pick responsibilities to CHI. He becomes the Bulls.
Skillz takes his roster and his owed pick responsibilities to MEM. He becomes the Grizzlies.
JB takes his roster and his owed pick responsibilities to ATL. He becomes the Hawks.
Play takes his roster and his owed pick responsibilities to LV. He becomes the unnamed Vegas team.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jan 9, 2009 2:30:02 GMT -5
Sounds great, sick.
|
|
|
|
Post by JBJB2FK on Jan 9, 2009 2:31:05 GMT -5
This is all for next season right?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 9, 2009 2:31:31 GMT -5
Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 9, 2009 2:32:40 GMT -5
It works within the game as well. Shouldve done that first, lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jan 9, 2009 2:34:45 GMT -5
It works within the game as well. Shouldve done that first, lol. Huh? |
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jan 9, 2009 2:35:01 GMT -5
I HATE TIM TEBOW!
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 9, 2009 2:35:41 GMT -5
It works within the game as well. Shouldve done that first, lol. Huh? I made sure I could actually edit team names and change divisions. |
|
Derwin
Starter
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,832
|
Post by Derwin on Jan 9, 2009 2:37:36 GMT -5
I like the idea. This will work out well IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jan 9, 2009 2:37:45 GMT -5
I made sure I could actually edit team names and change divisions. oooh sick, i had no idea changing divisions was possible |
|
Derwin
Starter
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,832
|
Post by Derwin on Jan 9, 2009 2:39:13 GMT -5
I made sure I could actually edit team names and change divisions. oooh sick, i had no idea changing divisions was possible Even if it wasn't possible to do, couldn't you just trade all the players from one team to the other? |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 9, 2009 2:41:08 GMT -5
oooh sick, i had no idea changing divisions was possible Even if it wasn't possible to do, couldn't you just trade all the players from one team to the other? Would be a pain. I could manually edit, but in this case team records stay with each squad as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Jan 9, 2009 2:44:10 GMT -5
I'm in favor.
|
|
Derwin
Starter
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,832
|
Post by Derwin on Jan 9, 2009 2:44:31 GMT -5
Even if it wasn't possible to do, couldn't you just trade all the players from one team to the other? Would be a pain. I could manually edit, but in this case team records stay with each squad as well. That's true, I didn't think of that. I mean I knew you could change team names, since Ashes is the Brooklyn Nets in UOSL. But its important to change over the conferences too. |
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Jan 9, 2009 2:54:16 GMT -5
Superman wears Tim Tebow pajamas. LOL  |
|
|
|
Post by Johnny "B. Good" Stamos on Jan 9, 2009 3:58:39 GMT -5
How about the team's picks? So now JB has no picks at all for the next 20 years?
|
|
Play
All-Star
Los Angeles Clippers
Posts: 5,702
|
Post by Play on Jan 9, 2009 4:11:41 GMT -5
How about the team's picks? So now JB has no picks at all for the next 20 years? everything should still be the same...Memphis is just switching names/conferences |
|
|
|
Post by JBJB2FK on Jan 9, 2009 4:29:26 GMT -5
Can I at least be called ATL Grizzlies or something
|
|
|
|
Post by easy on Jan 9, 2009 7:10:33 GMT -5
How about the team's picks? So now JB has no picks at all for the next 20 years? everything should still be the same...Memphis is just switching names/conferences Nanz rides the short bus, forgive him. |
|
GMGreggor
All-Star
Houston Rockets
Posts: 5,726
|
Post by GMGreggor on Jan 9, 2009 7:38:38 GMT -5
Much ado about nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by easy on Jan 9, 2009 8:54:50 GMT -5
what's that supposed to mean? I think the 4 people who voted No are all out West. |
|
GMGreggor
All-Star
Houston Rockets
Posts: 5,726
|
Post by GMGreggor on Jan 9, 2009 9:43:12 GMT -5
what's that supposed to mean? I think the 4 people who voted No are all out West. It's just not necessary to me. As I posted in another thread this is nothing new. Look at the current NBA. Last yr the West was so much stronger top to bottom than the East there was talk of different playoff format where teams with best records are in playoffs irregardless of conference. There's bitching now about SD getting into playoffs instead of NE in NFL. Thats just the way it works out. No system or lineup is perfect. A couple bad drafts in East or great drafts or FA signings in the West, PD swings etc and you can be right back here in 2/3 years. It's just overeaction to me. It's cyclical like everything. I dont really care though,I'm not adamant against it just think it's a kneejerk reaction. Whatever eh. |
|
Jay
Starter
Ex-GM
Bang...Bang...
Posts: 3,220 
|
Post by Jay on Jan 9, 2009 9:45:25 GMT -5
Even if it wasn't possible to do, couldn't you just trade all the players from one team to the other? Would be a pain. I could manually edit, but in this case team records stay with each squad as well. I'm pretty sure you have to trade every player back and forth from each team if they are switching conferences. In Global I moved from one conference to another (the weaker one), but I still played the same schedule I had when I was in the harder conference (playing only 2 games against opponents who were supposedly in my conference). It sucks, but if you just edit the cap to some ridiculous number you can do it fairly quickly. |
|
|
|
Post by easy on Jan 9, 2009 9:51:12 GMT -5
what's that supposed to mean? I think the 4 people who voted No are all out West. It's just not necessary to me. As I posted in another thread this is nothing new. Look at the current NBA. Last yr the West was so much stronger top to bottom than the East there was talk of different playoff format where teams with best records are in playoffs irregardless of conference. There's bitching now about SD getting into playoffs instead of NE in NFL. Thats just the way it works out. No system or lineup is perfect. A couple bad drafts in East or great drafts or FA signings in the West, PD swings etc and you can be right back here in 2/3 years. It's just overeaction to me. It's cyclical like everything. I dont really care though,I'm not adamant against it just think it's a kneejerk reaction. Whatever eh. I don't think it makes any sense to compare a simulation league to real life. Yes in BBS we strive to be as realistic as possible, but there are so many more factors involved in real-life compared to BBS that it isn't funny. First off, in the NBA they don't trade as much as they do here, and teams certainly don't trade all their picks for the next 10 seasons. It's not like in BBS you can draft a Monta Ellis, Gilbert Arenas, etc in the 2nd round of a draft and have an absolute stud on your team and "get lucky." I don't understand what the "cycle" is? The West has never truly been dominant over the East in this version of BBS, ever. There was a time when they West was very good when Krupinski and Hernando were here, yes, but it was never to the point where the East was as bad as the West now is. I don't see how anyone can object to this... why do people object to change? Seriously? Then it's the same people who complain that the league is boring and quit. Change as scary as it is people, IS GOOD. I've been interested more than ever now with BBS because we're doing new things... and there is nothing unrealistic about having Play take over the Kings and move them to Las Vegas considering the Maloof brothers want to do that same exact thing. Seriously, there are zero negatives to this. Skillz and Play aren't even the best the East has to offer so for all we know this change does nothing.. but at least it "shakes" things up and for a league in my eyes that was getting dull and boring.. this makes things exciting again. |
|
|
|
Post by Apollo on Jan 9, 2009 12:45:05 GMT -5
Would be a pain. I could manually edit, but in this case team records stay with each squad as well. I'm pretty sure you have to trade every player back and forth from each team if they are switching conferences. In Global I moved from one conference to another (the weaker one), but I still played the same schedule I had when I was in the harder conference (playing only 2 games against opponents who were supposedly in my conference). It sucks, but if you just edit the cap to some ridiculous number you can do it fairly quickly. You are correct, sir. |
|
