|
Post by Apollo on Feb 27, 2009 14:53:38 GMT -5
It's still not guaranteed.
|
|
|
Post by easy on Feb 27, 2009 14:54:39 GMT -5
whatever.. Yeah I forgot he’s going to re-sign Lebron aged 40 to 40 million per year and C.C. is amazing.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Feb 27, 2009 14:55:00 GMT -5
defending champs don't deal a 22 year-old superstar for worse pieces and then defend it by saying a 2022 pick will be a lotto. mcgahee is gonna be a 30 ppg guy
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Feb 27, 2009 14:56:00 GMT -5
defending champs don't deal a 22 year-old superstar for worse pieces and then defend it by saying a 2022 pick will be a lotto. mcgahee is gonna be a 30 ppg guy I guess there is a first for everything.
|
|
|
Post by easy on Feb 27, 2009 14:57:31 GMT -5
defending champs don't deal a 22 year-old superstar for worse pieces and then defend it by saying a 2022 pick will be a lotto. mcgahee is gonna be a 30 ppg guy Ha, I didn't defend it solely on the basis of a pick. If you read what I posted in the deal I clearly stated I was looking towards my future at the same time. McGahee and Roy are both expiring. I wanted to stay competitive while at the same time look towards my future. I got by the 1st and 2nd rounds by putting McGahee on the bench. I ran Brand, Williams, Durant, Henry, and Roy with McGahee backing up the 2 for the 1st and 2nd rounds. I can do the same now with York and Lawal. I gain OK a "potential" Lotto pick with Boston's and two young players who according to Spencer's notes with Thompson, should be ready to contribute immediately with 18ppg. Knock the deal all you want but I don't see how it makes me any significantly worse.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Feb 27, 2009 14:59:58 GMT -5
defending champs don't deal a 22 year-old superstar for worse pieces and then defend it by saying a 2022 pick will be a lotto. mcgahee is gonna be a 30 ppg guy Ha, I didn't defend it solely on the basis of a pick. If you read what I posted in the deal I clearly stated I was looking towards my future at the same time. McGahee and Roy are both expiring. I wanted to stay competitive while at the same time look towards my future. I got by the 1st and 2nd rounds by putting McGahee on the bench. I ran Brand, Williams, Durant, Henry, and Roy with McGahee backing up the 2 for the 1st and 2nd rounds. I can do the same now with York and Lawal. I gain OK a "potential" Lotto pick with Boston's and two young players who according to Spencer's notes with Thompson, should be ready to contribute immediately with 18ppg. Knock the deal all you want but I don't see how it makes me any significantly worse. you can't talk about moving mcgahee and say you're looking towards your future. that's just not logical. he's 23 and has a potential, and just had a ridiculously good season for you. he's as good as it gets as far as youth goes. ok, you got past the first round with him on the bench. he was playing, what, 30 mpg? he meant a lot to your team, and you know that.
|
|
|
Post by easy on Feb 27, 2009 15:00:56 GMT -5
Ha, I didn't defend it solely on the basis of a pick. If you read what I posted in the deal I clearly stated I was looking towards my future at the same time. McGahee and Roy are both expiring. I wanted to stay competitive while at the same time look towards my future. I got by the 1st and 2nd rounds by putting McGahee on the bench. I ran Brand, Williams, Durant, Henry, and Roy with McGahee backing up the 2 for the 1st and 2nd rounds. I can do the same now with York and Lawal. I gain OK a "potential" Lotto pick with Boston's and two young players who according to Spencer's notes with Thompson, should be ready to contribute immediately with 18ppg. Knock the deal all you want but I don't see how it makes me any significantly worse. you can't talk about moving mcgahee and say you're looking towards your future. that's just not logical. he's 23 and has a potential, and just had a ridiculously good season for you. he's as good as it gets as far as youth goes. ok, you got past the first round with him on the bench. he was playing, what, 30 mpg? he meant a lot to your team, and you know that. Let me bold this because you are missing the point completely. He was expiring.
|
|
|
Post by Apollo on Feb 27, 2009 15:01:12 GMT -5
with all this debate, watch Thompson explode in TC so martinez can just talk more shit
|
|
Jay
Starter
Ex-GM
Bang...Bang...
Posts: 3,220
|
Post by Jay on Feb 27, 2009 15:01:32 GMT -5
Look at me. LOOK AT ME. LOOK WHAT I'VE DONE. YOU DIDN'T DO IT. I'M SPECIAL!
|
|
|
Post by GP on Feb 27, 2009 15:03:31 GMT -5
Who won the championship this year? Spencer.
|
|
|
Post by easy on Feb 27, 2009 15:04:44 GMT -5
with all this debate, watch Thompson explode in TC so martinez can just talk more shit I hope so too.
|
|
|
Post by easy on Feb 27, 2009 15:04:57 GMT -5
Who won the championship this year? Spencer. Aww galo.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Feb 27, 2009 15:07:01 GMT -5
that kind of player does not get dealt because he's expiring. jeeze, you're the defending champs, that is weak to bring in as an argument. you had the favorites if you didn't do this trade. you could've waited for tc and gotten way more value for him, anyway, and on top of that, you move henry or roy, not mcgahee. and certainly not for that value. you have to at least make a lateral move to remain the favorite if youre gonna move him bc he's expiring
|
|
|
Post by easy on Feb 27, 2009 15:11:07 GMT -5
noted and understood.
|
|