|
Post by Ebener 12 on Mar 8, 2009 23:49:19 GMT -5
Link to him being listed as doubtful? Everything I heard was questionable.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Mar 8, 2009 23:56:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Mar 9, 2009 0:05:02 GMT -5
ESPN was reporting questionable all morning. That's what I went by.
Message board threads mean nothing to me. There's way more accurate sources
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Mar 9, 2009 0:16:56 GMT -5
Did you even read what I said? CBS reported it an hour before the game. That's where the threads came from.
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Mar 9, 2009 0:19:25 GMT -5
Yeah I did, ESPN reported all morning questionable and when I heard CBS 20 minutes before tipoff it was the same. Sounds to me like this is the media. Even if it's not, I see nothing wrong here.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Mar 9, 2009 0:23:50 GMT -5
All credible media reports come from somewhere, aka UNC in this case. CBS wasn't just making shit up.
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Mar 9, 2009 0:27:28 GMT -5
lol well there are varying reports depending on what network you are reading/listening to. Your just choosing to believe the one that supposedly makes Roy looks "bad."
I don't think your understanding what I'm saying, but this all is pretty pointless anyways.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Mar 9, 2009 0:41:43 GMT -5
lol ok. Roy has a history of doing this, I don't need to make him look "bad". It doesn't matter what report you look at, all the reports were bogus considering everyone knew Lawson was going to play all along. It's not a huge deal, I made one little comment about it and you thought I meant something different.
lol @ me not understanding what you're saying though.
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Mar 9, 2009 0:45:50 GMT -5
Don't take your anger out on me!!
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Mar 9, 2009 0:47:01 GMT -5
And if a player has some sort of injury, then you are required to report it on the list. Everyone knew he was going to say, like you said, so this is of no importance whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by easy on Mar 9, 2009 8:45:57 GMT -5
who cares UNC is garbage. Pitt is garbage.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 9, 2009 9:26:08 GMT -5
who cares UNC is garbage. Pitt is godly.
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Mar 9, 2009 10:16:01 GMT -5
who cares UNC is whack. Pitt is mad gay.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 9, 2009 10:38:32 GMT -5
GODLY! PITT IS GODLY!
|
|
Derwin
Starter
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,832
|
Post by Derwin on Mar 9, 2009 13:07:36 GMT -5
who cares UNC is #1. Pitt is NOT #1.
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Mar 9, 2009 14:24:31 GMT -5
I'm starting to like you Derwin! haha
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 9, 2009 14:32:47 GMT -5
They won'tttttt be the #1 overall seed, however, should Pitt win the Big East.
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Mar 9, 2009 14:35:28 GMT -5
UNC gets more love than Pittsburgh. If they both win out UNC will be the #1 overall seed.
But really, does anyone know when the #1 in both major polls hasn't gotten the #1 seed in the tournament? I really doubt it's happened more than a time or two if that.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 9, 2009 14:39:58 GMT -5
UNC gets more love than Pittsburgh. If they both win out UNC will be the #1 overall seed. But really, does anyone know when the #1 in both major polls hasn't gotten the #1 seed in the tournament? I really doubt it's happened more than a time or two if that. The committee doesn't use rankings. The committee doesn't use rankings. The committee doesn't use rankings. Write that 1000 times and you might damn well remember it. Memphis will not be a #1 seed. They will, however, be the #3 team in the country. Pitt has a better overall resume than UNC. Pitt, if the season ended today, would be the #1 overall seed in my opinion. And, as we've already established, my opinion is all that really matters.
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Mar 9, 2009 14:41:07 GMT -5
UNC gets more love than Pittsburgh. If they both win out UNC will be the #1 overall seed. But really, does anyone know when the #1 in both major polls hasn't gotten the #1 seed in the tournament? I really doubt it's happened more than a time or two if that. The committee doesn't use rankings. The committee doesn't use rankings. The committee doesn't use rankings. Write that 1000 times and you might damn well remember it. Memphis will not be a #1 seed. They will, however, be the #3 team in the country. Pitt has a better overall resume than UNC. Pitt, if the season ended today, would be the #1 overall seed in my opinion. And, as we've already established, my opinion is all that really matters. Your not even listening to what I'm saying. If someone was to look, me and you are way to lazy, you would see that there is a relationship comparing the #1 seed in the tournament with the #1 seed in both major polls. Come on Maniac, USE YOUR BRAINZZZZZZZZZZZZ
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 9, 2009 14:54:18 GMT -5
I'm listening to what you're saying, and yes, I'm far too lazy to do anything like that.
|
|