aar
All-Star
Seattle SuperSonics
Posts: 6,306
|
Post by aar on Mar 22, 2009 1:13:14 GMT -5
I think things are cool the way they are, but at the same time, it seems like this league has more talent than ever, which results in higher salaries than ever.
For example:
Boston Celtics -$33,211,669 Miami Heat -$37,422,998 New York Knicks -$32,473,528 Orlando Magic -$34,762,538 Philadelphia 76ers -$34,787,243 Cleveland Cavaliers -$34,055,080 Detroit Pistons -$34,594,131 Indiana Pacers -$34,234,885 Milwaukee Bucks -$33,384,450 Toronto Raptors -$34,211,237 Dallas Mavericks -$33,658,878 Denver Nuggets -$32,135,768 Houston Rockets -$33,118,188 Minnesota Timberwolves -$31,284,201 San Antonio Spurs -$35,400,967 Memphis Grizzlies -$34,902,341 Los Angeles Clippers -$34,834,644 Los Angeles Lakers -$34,950,222 Phoenix Suns -$34,870,810 Portland Trail Blazers -$34,735,273 Seattle SuperSonics -$34,812,672
21 out of 29 teams are ridiculously close to the hard cap. I'm not sure if it's like that every year, but it's a pretty shocking number.
Do you think that a raise to 87 or 88 mil. hard cap is a possibility or should it be out of the question?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 22, 2009 1:17:58 GMT -5
I like 85. I think I need to weaken the depth of future draft classes.
|
|
aar
All-Star
Seattle SuperSonics
Posts: 6,306
|
Post by aar on Mar 22, 2009 1:19:36 GMT -5
Speaking of which, where's that 2021 board?
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Mar 22, 2009 1:20:49 GMT -5
I like where we're at.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 22, 2009 1:20:58 GMT -5
Tomorrow. Breakfast, sim, nap, edit board.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 22, 2009 1:21:19 GMT -5
Speaking of which, Im getting up in 8 hours. Nighty night.
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 22, 2009 1:22:04 GMT -5
I think it is fine where it is at, anymore could really help out some of the top contending teams even more so
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 22, 2009 1:22:16 GMT -5
GOOD NIGHT SPENCE
|
|
|
Post by Apollo on Mar 22, 2009 1:38:31 GMT -5
I like 85.
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Mar 22, 2009 1:39:52 GMT -5
u dont need to weaken the draft. us GMs just need to be smarter with our money.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Mar 22, 2009 1:40:10 GMT -5
Speaking of which, Im getting up in 8 hours. Nighty night. NOOO
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Mar 22, 2009 1:40:27 GMT -5
HC is fine I think. If it was 87 then we'd all be at 86.9.
|
|
Idle
Scrub
Ex-GM
Posts: 413
|
Post by Idle on Mar 22, 2009 1:43:01 GMT -5
If you weaken future drafts - how will Hornets become the dominant franchise we all envisioned when I was hired? Continue to fuck over teams currently trying to compete and N'awlins will be fine.
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Mar 24, 2009 11:32:08 GMT -5
I think its more about the soft cap. You should lower the soft cap to like 47-48. It'll keep contracts down a lil
|
|
Idle
Scrub
Ex-GM
Posts: 413
|
Post by Idle on Mar 24, 2009 11:44:22 GMT -5
It'd help if teams weren't allowed to go over the max to resign their players with the 120% of their previous salary rule. That's where GMs get into trouble.
|
|