|
Post by Spencer on Mar 23, 2009 16:59:13 GMT -5
Ive always been down with allowing GMs to play whoever they want wherever they want as long as they arent playing inferior personnel. With Sidney playing well at PG a GM brought up how he thought it was unfair that Sidney is allowed to play PG. Obviously it is completely unrealistic to have a Center/Power Forward playing Point Guard but its a sim league and I hate enforcing too many restrictions.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Mar 23, 2009 16:59:52 GMT -5
yes, i hate rules like this. ruined slor for me.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 23, 2009 17:01:07 GMT -5
Yeah, I think it's ridiculous that someone like Sidney can dominate at PG because of how stupid FBB is.
|
|
|
Post by easy on Mar 23, 2009 17:01:31 GMT -5
he's got B+ handles I don't understand the arguement here and how is it not realistic "Point-Forwards" have existed throughout the years in real life.. see Antoine Walker, John Jonson, Scottie Pippen ,Vlade Divac, Arvydas Sabonis, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 23, 2009 17:01:50 GMT -5
I voted for should be allowed, but I dont care either way.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 23, 2009 17:02:17 GMT -5
he's got B+ handles I don't understand the arguement here and how is it not realistic "Point-Forwards" have existed throughout the years in real life.. see Antoine Walker, John Jonson, Scottie Pippen ,Vlade Divac, Arvydas Sabonis, etc. Just because they have certain plays set up where they start the offense doesnt mean they started at PG.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 23, 2009 17:03:03 GMT -5
Even a team like the Bulls had Paxson or Armstrong as the starting PG. The ball was handled by Jordan or Pippen the majority of time, but thats why we have options in FBB.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 23, 2009 17:04:55 GMT -5
Yeah, but in real life a guy like Sidney would never work at PG. Quicker PG's would annihilate him. FBB doesn't recognize that.
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 23, 2009 17:05:53 GMT -5
I think it can be kind of ridiculous but I think to many restrictions are no fun for the league. Let it happen.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Mar 23, 2009 17:06:56 GMT -5
I just think they should have to sacrifice their rebounding if they're gonna move to PG, since it's an unfair advantage, as most teams play guys listed at PG as their PGs, so they lose rebounding points/can't go above 50.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Mar 23, 2009 17:07:08 GMT -5
But I definitely didn't complain and don't care either way.
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Mar 23, 2009 17:07:09 GMT -5
Lower the handles and rebounding IMO.
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Mar 23, 2009 17:07:21 GMT -5
It's funny people notice the MLE thing when i do it. Sidney at pg when i do it but other people do it and it's not an issue.
I wonder who brung it up. Probably too much of a bitch too say it out loud.
I hate this rule in PWW because you should be allowed to be creative and be able to maximize your roster talents in any way possible.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny "B. Good" Stamos on Mar 23, 2009 17:07:35 GMT -5
Lower the handles and rebounding IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 23, 2009 17:07:42 GMT -5
What if we just made a rule that a player had to be listed at a position to start there?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 23, 2009 17:08:40 GMT -5
It's funny people notice the MLE thing when i do it. Sidney at pg when i do it but other people do it and it's not an issue. I wonder who brung it up. Probably too much of a bitch too say it out loud. I hate this rule in PWW because you should be allowed to be creative and be able to maximize your roster talents in any way possible. Whats the MLE thing? No other players have played guys out of position this blatantly before. I mean using SF's at PG is different then using C/PFs there.
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Mar 23, 2009 17:09:15 GMT -5
What if we just made a rule that a player had to be listed at a position to start there? That would make it more work for you, no? Make the rule primarily for the PG position and it should be fine. The PG position is the easiest one to take advantage of.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Mar 23, 2009 17:10:06 GMT -5
It's funny people notice the MLE thing when i do it. Sidney at pg when i do it but other people do it and it's not an issue. I wonder who brung it up. Probably too much of a bitch too say it out loud. I hate this rule in PWW because you should be allowed to be creative and be able to maximize your roster talents in any way possible. I already said it was me.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 23, 2009 17:11:52 GMT -5
What if we just made a rule that a player had to be listed at a position to start there? That would make it more work for you, no? Make the rule primarily for the PG position and it should be fine. The PG position is the easiest one to take advantage of. I dont think it would be too big a deal.
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Mar 23, 2009 17:12:53 GMT -5
Play is playin Bobo at pg.
Sidney is a rare player and has B+ handles, who can shoot from the outside its not like i have your typical PF/C at pg.
Maniac is a fuckin homo. Fuckin sour puss. Its a game a lot of aspects will not be realistic.
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 23, 2009 17:13:29 GMT -5
The MLE thing is that we were never allowed to extend a players contract past 3 seasons. No one ever did this before, we all thought it could be only 2 or 3 years. Than suddenly he could extend it to 5.
|
|
Play
All-Star
Los Angeles Clippers
Posts: 5,702
|
Post by Play on Mar 23, 2009 17:14:13 GMT -5
Lower the handles and rebounding IMO.
|
|
Play
All-Star
Los Angeles Clippers
Posts: 5,702
|
Post by Play on Mar 23, 2009 17:14:57 GMT -5
What if we just made a rule that a player had to be listed at a position to start there? I'm down for that
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Mar 23, 2009 17:15:04 GMT -5
That would make it more work for you, no? Make the rule primarily for the PG position and it should be fine. The PG position is the easiest one to take advantage of. I dont think it would be too big a deal. I guess. The way I saw it was if someone played a 6'7' SG at SF, he'd have to change position. Then if he was traded to play SG, that's another switch back to SG. That type of stuff happens a ton with C/PF's (like me, I'm starting Carter at C even though he's a PF) Not to mention, that's going through a bunch of DC's and rosters. but if you don't mind, then ok.
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 23, 2009 17:15:55 GMT -5
NVM i guess you did not extend him 4 years.
|
|