|
Post by Spencer on Feb 5, 2008 11:49:10 GMT -5
Ive always planned to switch the the new FBB when it comes out, but as time passes, it becomes obvious that the new FBB isnt coming out. So, I have pretty much determined that we will run this for as long as it can go. I like this set of GMs, I like the rules we have in place, and I like the fact that we have about 5 guys who want in on top of the 29 GMs.
I have started working on future draft classes, and have decided Ill try to run through 2014 with real players, then start the college league in 2015.
Should we consider picking up the pace for the next season or 2? I feel as though the non-active Gms are either just not into the league yet, or are completely rebuilding. Just something to talk about I suppose. I could pretty easily pick up the sim pace and we can get this and next season done more quickly.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Feb 5, 2008 12:18:19 GMT -5
I don't mind the next two seasons going by a bit more quickly, but then will the contract year still be enforced in it's entirety or will you be more leniant?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 5, 2008 12:20:08 GMT -5
I don't mind the next two seasons going by a bit more quickly, but then will the contract year still be enforced in it's entirety or will you be more leniant? I wouldn't want to change any rules. If people would be concerned about that with this and next year going by more quickly, I guess we shouldn't considered speeding things up.
|
|
|
Post by Shaunkol on Feb 5, 2008 12:29:50 GMT -5
im eager to join
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 5, 2008 12:31:13 GMT -5
I think we should lose one Gm from the first Contract year. i highly doubt that all the teams tanking can right themselves.
|
|
|
Post by duceisinmyheart on Feb 5, 2008 12:32:41 GMT -5
and how will you make your decision on who that one gm should be?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 5, 2008 12:34:51 GMT -5
and how will you make your decision on who that one gm should be? Im sorry, I should've said at least 1.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 5, 2008 12:35:48 GMT -5
With a bunch teams tanking from the start I guess its possible we could lose 1-3 or 5 Gms.
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Feb 5, 2008 12:37:01 GMT -5
Should we consider picking up the pace for the next season or 2? Yes, please.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 5, 2008 12:38:12 GMT -5
I just think at the least we could sped up the pace for this year. I mean it shouldnt really affect the teams competing much, as there arent many deals being made. I also think it will speed up the timetable for tanking teams to try, which is a big reason why trading is down.
|
|
|
Post by DB on Feb 5, 2008 12:39:17 GMT -5
I do not care what we really do. Speeding up the sim in the next year or two is fine with me. I think this league will last a pretty long time which is exciting, If you need any help with the college league, I can do some things.
|
|
Play
All-Star
Los Angeles Clippers
Posts: 5,702
|
Post by Play on Feb 5, 2008 13:47:51 GMT -5
Should we consider picking up the pace for the next season or 2? Yes, please.
|
|
Tigertecz
Starter
Golden State Warriors
Hello there
Posts: 3,282
|
Post by Tigertecz on Feb 5, 2008 14:43:47 GMT -5
I'm good with whatever. To be honest I think the current pace of the league is fine, but if you want to speed it up, I don't think it'd cause much fuss. I wouldn't mind either way.
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Feb 5, 2008 17:23:29 GMT -5
I think the speed should definitely be picked up. I been wondering why didn't have more 10 day sims. I personally can't really be that active but at the same time there's nothing really going to make me want to be more active.
I think so many teams tanking will make for an interesting battle uphill for all the teams involved..
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Feb 5, 2008 17:58:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by noves on Feb 5, 2008 18:22:38 GMT -5
Agreed, we should do 10 days sims after the ASB.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Feb 5, 2008 18:23:02 GMT -5
Agreed, why not?
|
|
|
Post by Aaron2344 on Feb 5, 2008 18:25:04 GMT -5
speed is ok to me...no need to rush through anything
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Feb 5, 2008 18:32:09 GMT -5
I wouldn't want to speed anything up and I think with another draft class under our belt people will become more interested in having more guys to spend RCs on and there should be a solid free agency as well.
|
|
James
Scrub
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,398
|
Post by James on Feb 5, 2008 18:32:57 GMT -5
We need to pick the pace up. I think the contract year should still be enforced because it's not as if we will be simming 20 days at a time as a result.
Also, I think your proposal about draft classes soudns reasonable, Spencer.
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Feb 5, 2008 20:02:57 GMT -5
Whatever works for you spence, i'm fine either way
I just hope we don't stop even when we get fake players
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Feb 5, 2008 23:33:02 GMT -5
Either way regardless the rules should be enforced. I dont see how that should change if things are sped up a lil bit.
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Feb 6, 2008 0:54:19 GMT -5
sweet! good to hear we won't slow this down. I was a little disappointed when we stopped the last BBS before this one. I thought things were running great.
But it's nice to know that this one won't stop.
nice job, spencer.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 6, 2008 11:08:29 GMT -5
I will increase the sim pace slightly. try and finish a couple days ahead of schedule.
|
|