|
|
Post by Spencer on May 30, 2009 11:22:07 GMT -5
Thales McReynolds SG 6'3'' 185 22 C B C+ C D+ C
Frank Granat SG 6'5'' 209 22 C- C+ C- C C- C
John Rambo SG 6'5'' 218 22 C+ C C C+ D+ C
Warren Isaac SG 6'5'' 187 22 C C C+ C C C
Dennis McGovern SG 6'4'' 203 22 C B- C- C+ C- C
Ted Manning SG 6'6'' 214 20 C C C C+ C- C
Bogie Redmon SG 6'3'' 226 23 C C C B- C- C
Don Davidson SG 6'2'' 202 22 C+ C C B C C
Theodore Werner SG 6'2'' 202 22 B- B- C C C C
Bill Meyer SG 6'3'' 195 20 C- C+ B- C+ C- C
Dan Wolters SG 6'6'' 202 19 C+ C+ C+ C+ C C
Leroy Walker SG 6'4'' 204 18 C C+ C- C C- C
Terry Kunze SG 6'4'' 210 22 C B C C+ D+ C
Eddie Jackson SG 6'5'' 212 23 C- C C+ C D+ C
Richie Tarrant SG 6'6'' 181 20 C C C- C- C- C
Jay Neary SG 6'2'' 187 20 C C C C+ C C
Bob Trupin SG 6'1'' 192 23 C- C D+ C C- C
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 30, 2009 11:22:27 GMT -5
Weak shooting guard class, so possibly some surprise potentials here.
|
|
Dash
Scrub
Ex-GM
Posts: 1,977
|
Post by Dash on May 31, 2009 18:36:27 GMT -5
Any guy with Rambo as his last name should have 100 potential. Or at least 100 strength.
|
|
Matt
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 1,899
|
Post by Matt on Jun 1, 2009 0:02:20 GMT -5
Everyone is C C C- C+ C C
|
|
Pacman
All-Star
Boston Celtics
2023 & 2031 BBS CHAMPIONS
Posts: 7,370
|
Post by Pacman on Jun 1, 2009 0:03:22 GMT -5
Dan Wolters SG 6'6'' 202 19 C+ C+ C+ C+ C C
Leroy Walker SG 6'4'' 204 18 C C+ C- C C- C
steals
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 4, 2009 15:15:30 GMT -5
Literally no one worth profiling. A couple of these guys will be good though, and one might be an All Star one day.
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jun 4, 2009 15:26:05 GMT -5
Literally no one worth profiling. A couple of these guys will be good though, and one might be an All Star one day. Then why the hell wouldn't you profile him? |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 4, 2009 15:33:45 GMT -5
Literally no one worth profiling. A couple of these guys will be good though, and one might be an All Star one day. Then why the hell wouldn't you profile him? Because it is pretty obviously gonna be a steal. Why would a profile a guy that looked like poop after I said no one is worth profiling? |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 4, 2009 15:34:24 GMT -5
Aaron, youre weird.
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jun 4, 2009 15:45:53 GMT -5
Then why the hell wouldn't you profile him? Because it is pretty obviously gonna be a steal. Why would a profile a guy that looked like poop after I said no one is worth profiling? WHY WOULD YOU MAKE AN ALL STAR WITHOUT ANY HINT THAT HE'S GONNA BE WORTHWHILE? STEALS THAT GOOD SHOULDN'T BE RANDOM! THAT'S BULLSHVITS! |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 4, 2009 15:46:13 GMT -5
Weak shooting guard class, so possibly some surprise potentials here. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 4, 2009 15:47:20 GMT -5
Because it is pretty obviously gonna be a steal. Why would a profile a guy that looked like poop after I said no one is worth profiling? WHY WOULD YOU MAKE AN ALL STAR WITHOUT ANY HINT THAT HE'S GONNA BE WORTHWHILE? STEALS THAT GOOD SHOULDN'T BE RANDOM! THAT'S BULLSHVITS! The whole SG class sucks though. If I profiled 1 guy, Id need to profile like 5 so you wouldn't automatically know who the special player is. So much to learn young Habes. |
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jun 4, 2009 15:52:01 GMT -5
WHY WOULD YOU MAKE AN ALL STAR WITHOUT ANY HINT THAT HE'S GONNA BE WORTHWHILE? STEALS THAT GOOD SHOULDN'T BE RANDOM! THAT'S BULLSHVITS! The whole SG class sucks though. If I profiled 1 guy, Id need to profile like 5 so you wouldn't automatically know who the special player is. So much to learn young Habes. so what? why wouldn't you profile five guys then?!? |
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jun 4, 2009 15:53:45 GMT -5
I KNOW WHO IT IS!
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 4, 2009 16:06:27 GMT -5
The whole SG class sucks though. If I profiled 1 guy, Id need to profile like 5 so you wouldn't automatically know who the special player is. So much to learn young Habes. so what? why wouldn't you profile five guys then?!? Cause they all look horrible. Im not gonna profile 5 guys just to perpetuate what you want. All these guys look like they suck. Some will have nice potential. One will have 100 potential. The end. it seemed like a pretty simple scenario. |
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jun 4, 2009 16:12:50 GMT -5
Dustin Jackson had 100 potential, right spence!?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jun 4, 2009 16:19:05 GMT -5
Maybe.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jun 4, 2009 16:32:31 GMT -5
John Rambo FTW!
|
|
Pacman
All-Star
Boston Celtics
2023 & 2031 BBS CHAMPIONS
Posts: 7,370
|
Post by Pacman on Aug 18, 2009 23:49:31 GMT -5
Leroy Walker SG 6'4'' 204 18 C C+ C- C C- C
Leroy Walker SG 21 6'5'' 207 C A C+ B+ C B
dayyymn. he must of had 100 pot.
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Aug 18, 2009 23:55:11 GMT -5
Leroy Walker SG 6'4'' 204 18 C C+ C- C C- C Leroy Walker SG 21 6'5'' 207 C A C+ B+ C Bdayyymn. he must of had 100 pot. haha, that's crazy |
|
