Matt
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 1,899
|
Post by Matt on Oct 15, 2009 23:55:48 GMT -5
Mavs get:
J.Jackson
Vet FA
Nuggets get:
J.Russell
Mavs 2038 1st
I agree.
J.Jackson and Hyde will be pretty good upfront. I'll Move Manzi to SG or have him backup the 1-3. SVH at PG and Mancini at SF like last year. I have Cylde Lee, JJ White and Fuller as depth.
|
|
Matt
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 1,899
|
Post by Matt on Oct 15, 2009 23:56:54 GMT -5
Plus I lose 2 more mill to give me more HC space.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Oct 16, 2009 0:07:47 GMT -5
Agree. Good value and gotta switch things up. I have always loved Russell's production compared to his low turnovers. That's a very rare player.
|
|
Matt
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 1,899
|
Post by Matt on Oct 16, 2009 0:10:14 GMT -5
I had to move the 1st to get the deal done. However, that 1st will be during my contract year after I start rebuilding.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 16, 2009 11:45:25 GMT -5
VET FAs cant be dealt until after FA. If you guys want this done earlier adding Dietrick and Long make it work and those 2 can be dealt back after FA.
|
|
Matt
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 1,899
|
Post by Matt on Oct 16, 2009 13:48:09 GMT -5
Dietrick and Long instead of the Vet FA is fine with me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Oct 16, 2009 13:51:31 GMT -5
k i want dietrick back
|
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Oct 16, 2009 14:25:10 GMT -5
Amazing that Russell has such a Low TO number for his handle rating.
|
|
Matt
Scrub
Dallas Mavericks
Posts: 1,899
|
Post by Matt on Oct 16, 2009 15:10:03 GMT -5
Yea but I don't see why people think that's such a huge plus. He may only average 0.8TOPG but he only gets 1.4apg, that's a pretty bad ratio. Russell is a very good player but I don't see his handling production as much of a plus to his game, if at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 16, 2009 15:58:06 GMT -5
trade in
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 17, 2009 1:39:20 GMT -5
|
|
