|
|
Post by GP on Oct 18, 2009 17:16:03 GMT -5
Clippers receive:
G Dustin Jackson
Hawks receive:
G Kenyon Guyton
F Byron Hasty
G David Abernathy
confirmed. thanks man.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Oct 18, 2009 17:21:22 GMT -5
Nice for the Clipps
|
|
FAIL
Scrub
Atlanta Hawks
Posts: 521
|
Post by FAIL on Oct 18, 2009 17:28:35 GMT -5
I agree.
Jackson's outside went up to A+ but his inside went down. That A+ plus his preseason numbers gives him the most trade value he will ever have.
He's a B- defender and it's kind of hard to be ok with having a B- defender guarding shooting guards.
With Guyton I gain an entire defensive grade and not much of a drop, if any, offensively.
|
|
aar
All-Star
Seattle SuperSonics
Posts: 6,306
|
Post by aar on Oct 18, 2009 17:29:30 GMT -5
Yeah, I really like this for the Clips
|
|
FAIL
Scrub
Atlanta Hawks
Posts: 521
|
Post by FAIL on Oct 18, 2009 17:31:37 GMT -5
I mean, ok, but why
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Oct 18, 2009 17:33:35 GMT -5
Jackson is just a better player than Melton
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Oct 18, 2009 17:34:08 GMT -5
He doesn't turn it over and is a signifcantly better scorer. Put Jax in an outside offense as an option and he'll do 25-26 ppg.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Oct 18, 2009 17:34:32 GMT -5
Who the fuck is Melton?
|
|
FAIL
Scrub
Atlanta Hawks
Posts: 521
|
Post by FAIL on Oct 18, 2009 17:37:52 GMT -5
Actually, I didn't mean that. You guys don't have to explain why you like this better for the Clipps. Won't make a difference.
Nobody liked the Davis trade, or the Price trade, but all those did was propel my inherited 19-30 team to a 21-12 run to finish the season.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 19, 2009 0:12:14 GMT -5
Actually, I didn't mean that. You guys don't have to explain why you like this better for the Clipps. Won't make a difference. Nobody liked the Davis trade, or the Price trade, but all those did was propel my inherited 19-30 team to a 21-12 run to finish the season. Its possible to lose value wise and sim better. I think you lost value last year. I think you lose value here. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 19, 2009 0:13:03 GMT -5
Hawks need 2 cuts?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 19, 2009 0:29:54 GMT -5
Yup. 2 cuts for the Hawks.
|
|
|
|
Post by GP on Oct 19, 2009 0:32:53 GMT -5
Ya I pmed him already. Didnt even occur to me to tell him to cut dudes.
|
|
FAIL
Scrub
Atlanta Hawks
Posts: 521
|
Post by FAIL on Oct 19, 2009 8:55:02 GMT -5
Sorry, I knew that and got caught up in other stuff. Done.
|
|
FAIL
Scrub
Atlanta Hawks
Posts: 521
|
Post by FAIL on Oct 19, 2009 8:58:19 GMT -5
Actually, I didn't mean that. You guys don't have to explain why you like this better for the Clipps. Won't make a difference. Nobody liked the Davis trade, or the Price trade, but all those did was propel my inherited 19-30 team to a 21-12 run to finish the season. Its possible to lose value wise and sim better. I think you lost value last year. I think you lose value here. I understand what your saying, but I just think it's very hard to win with B- defense on opposing shooting guards for almost 40 mpg. |
|
|
|
Post by GP on Oct 19, 2009 12:14:03 GMT -5
Yup. 2 cuts for the Hawks. His cuts are under the transactions Spencer. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 19, 2009 13:16:34 GMT -5
trade in
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Oct 19, 2009 17:09:54 GMT -5
|
|
