|
|
Post by DB on Jan 8, 2008 20:35:25 GMT -5
Zach Randolph 6-9 270 07/16/81 Michigan St.  Strengths: Great combination of strength and agility. Moves his 270 pound frame like a small forward... Supreme intelligence and creativity... Very strong physically and mentally... Soft hands.. Leadership qualities. Great post game, and a future double double guy. Weaknesses: Appears overweight but it doesn't really seem to be a problem,... Not super away from the basket, and needs to work on his defense. Will get lazy at times and could be dominated in the paint. Potential Ratings: B- C- D+ C C+ A |
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Jan 8, 2008 22:41:08 GMT -5
weak ratings.
Potential Ratings: B C- D+ C B- B would be sexier.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Jan 8, 2008 22:46:29 GMT -5
^I think you have to keep him with A potential... there were weight concerns but he was a freshman coming off a good year on a Final Four team (i believe). I think the ratings Spencer gave him were pretty fair
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Jan 8, 2008 22:56:26 GMT -5
^I think you have to keep him with A potential... there were weight concerns but he was a freshman coming off a good year on a Final Four team (i believe). I think the ratings Spencer gave him were pretty fair Well in his 3rd year in the NBA he averaged 20ppg and 11rpg, so I think his rebounding and scoring need to be higher.. B C- D+ C B- A is good IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by noves on Jan 8, 2008 23:23:03 GMT -5
I think his ratings are fine, if anything maybe to B- rebounding, but even that might be a stretch.
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Jan 9, 2008 0:14:25 GMT -5
He averaged that on a shitty Blazers team. Randolph sucks. He can score and has a nice nose for the basket but plays no defense and lacks so many other fundementals
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Jan 9, 2008 15:00:36 GMT -5
Those are horrendous ratings
I'd say
B C D+ C-/C B A
|
|
Tigertecz
Starter
Golden State Warriors
Hello there
Posts: 3,282
|
Post by Tigertecz on Jan 9, 2008 15:20:05 GMT -5
I think the ratings are fine. If the potential is real and he has a high B- inside and a high C+ rebounding, there is no reason why he won't be able to get 20/10 in this league.
|
|
WillC
Scrub
Original 76ers GM
Posts: 303
|
Post by WillC on Jan 9, 2008 17:26:57 GMT -5
I agree with some of the others - his ratings seem way off.
With A potential (which he deserves), he might end up being a good defender... which he definitely isn't in real life. Therefore maybe give him C- defense to start with.
But he's a great post-scorer (maybe start at B inside scoring) and rebounder, so I'd definitely bump the latter up from C+.
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Jan 9, 2008 19:16:37 GMT -5
B C- D+ C- B A
Those would be interesting ratings...
with good potential he should be like A- C D+ C A- C which I think is a good projection.
|
|
James
Scrub
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,398
|
Post by James on Jan 9, 2008 20:59:23 GMT -5
B C D+ C- B- A
^^ IMO
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 10, 2008 0:39:54 GMT -5
Once again, Im gonna try and make players interesting, not necessarily exactly how they were in real life. I dont want players to turn out exactly how I think they are in the NBA today, or even how they looked to GMs the year they came out. I just want good drafts, that have intriguing story lines.
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Jan 10, 2008 13:33:57 GMT -5
Ball hog!
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jan 10, 2008 16:22:41 GMT -5
Yeah. He's not fun to watch at all. He's had like five good quarters all season ever since the first six games.
|
|
