|
|
Post by DB on Mar 19, 2008 21:24:42 GMT -5
Trevor Ariza Position: SF Born: 6/30/85 Height: 6-7 Weight: 194 lbs College: UCLA  Strengths: He is a very versatile player, that will come out and play hard every night. He has some great athleticism and a strong move to the basket. He can rebound pretty well and should be a solid defender in the BBS. Weaknesses: Not the best jump shot, he needs to work on that part of his game. He will not score 20 a night for you, but he will be a great player to have come off the bench and defend the 2/3. He may win a dunk contest in his day. Potential Ratings: B- C- C- B C+ B |
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 19, 2008 21:41:17 GMT -5
C+ rebounder? His skinny ass isn't rebounding for shit
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Mar 19, 2008 22:16:50 GMT -5
um, btw this guy was a big time project when he entered the draft:
C+ C- C- B- C A or something would probably be better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Mar 20, 2008 1:48:21 GMT -5
He wasn't a big time project just because he left after a year. He went 46th for a reason. Extremely limited game, though I love him.
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Mar 20, 2008 1:51:58 GMT -5
He wasn't a big time project just because he left after a year. He went 46th for a reason. Extremely limited game, though I love him. Still though. He was drafted because of his athleticism and his upside. Not because he was coming into the league as a good defender/rebounder. I'm just nit picking though, it doesn't really matter. But when he was @ UCLA, he wasn't anything great. I was really surprised when he entered early. |
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Mar 20, 2008 2:53:43 GMT -5
He wasn't a big time project just because he left after a year. He went 46th for a reason. Extremely limited game, though I love him. Still though. He was drafted because of his athleticism and his upside. Not because he was coming into the league as a good defender/rebounder. I'm just nit picking though, it doesn't really matter. But when he was @ UCLA, he wasn't anything great. I was really surprised when he entered early. I agree with ducky |
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Mar 20, 2008 5:27:46 GMT -5
Trev is a good rebounder though, so i guess C+ is fair with B potential.
I always thought he was going to be better than he turned out to be, though i was a knick homer back then
|
|
