|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Sept 6, 2008 1:36:56 GMT -5
He will not be on the team for more than 10 games in the regular season.
1st Team SG, among the league leaders in many categories.
Sure he is on a large contract, I don't really care. He hasn't declined much at all, especially with the +10 upgrade a few seasons ago.
1sts, youth, expirings. PM or post
|
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Sept 6, 2008 11:14:40 GMT -5
We'll talk in the offseason.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Sept 6, 2008 12:51:45 GMT -5
We'll talk in the offseason. |
|
|
|
Post by Johnny "B. Good" Stamos on Sept 6, 2008 13:01:26 GMT -5
We'll talk in the offseason. |
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Sept 6, 2008 13:32:06 GMT -5
We'll talk in the offseason. |
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Sept 6, 2008 13:32:22 GMT -5
I actually have no interest. I just wanted to be cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny "B. Good" Stamos on Sept 6, 2008 15:09:14 GMT -5
I actually have no interest. I just wanted to be cool. haha I cant afford him either. |
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Sept 6, 2008 15:45:03 GMT -5
its all good maniac and nanz
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Sept 6, 2008 22:13:03 GMT -5
I dont want him
|
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Sept 7, 2008 0:40:14 GMT -5
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Sept 7, 2008 1:11:43 GMT -5
Si
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Sept 7, 2008 2:20:13 GMT -5
Just say no to drugs.......
........and paul pierce
|
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Sept 7, 2008 12:29:36 GMT -5
Just say no to drugs....... ........and paul pierce so you don't want him? |
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Sept 7, 2008 15:40:24 GMT -5
I think the Jazz should've dealt him during the season. At the age of 34 with the contract its going to be somewhat tough to get any value. Might have to move rose to rebuild properly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Sept 7, 2008 15:56:18 GMT -5
Keeping him was a chance I was willing to take. He got me to 40 wins which was huge. I still think he has value and he has shown that by being top 5 scoring in the league. If that isn't value I don't know what is.
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Sept 7, 2008 16:10:18 GMT -5
Its age thought. I mean you'll learn as you keep moving along the way people value players. Hopefully you can get something decent though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Sept 7, 2008 16:24:49 GMT -5
Oh please. His value during the season was as low as it is now, and he's what, the best offensive player in BBS? This is the kinda guy you don't dump; he helps you WAY more than anything you get ever will, and with a PG like Rose improving every year, you try to keep adding good pieces because you won't find a guy like Pierce. Who cares about salary or age when he's that good?
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Sept 7, 2008 16:30:35 GMT -5
29/7/5 and he gets Andrew 40 wins in his first year, which is huge because it gives him time to figure out what he wants to do with the team. Had he dealt Pierce, he'd be scrambling to get 40 wins by only his fourth season in BBS. Definitely wasn't a mistake to keep Pierce.
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Sept 7, 2008 16:46:40 GMT -5
I think the Jazz listening to you is a bad move. Win one year try to rebuild the next without your own picks is a bad move. It can work to an extent. They should completely rebuild. They're not going nowhere. If they keep rose they'll be a late lotto team.
You keep pierce until the deadline. He's 34 now with an ugly contract. Yeah, he has Rose. An overpaid solid center. But your saying he should keep that core? lol I dealt all my guys in 09 around the deadline and pierce/shaq were gone before the all star game. It's just smart. My point is he could have gotten the 40, and dealt him.
Best offensive player? Uh. Hes definitely up there. Anyways, im not trying to decrease his value just was trying to help out with an opinion it wasnt meant to be an argumentative point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Sept 7, 2008 16:50:30 GMT -5
I think the Jazz listening to you is a bad move. Win one year try to rebuild the next without your own picks is a bad move. It can work to an extent. They should completely rebuild. They're not going nowhere. If they keep rose they'll be a late lotto team. You keep pierce until the deadline. He's 34 now with an ugly contract. Yeah, he has Rose. An overpaid solid center. But your saying he should keep that core? lol I dealt all my guys in 09 around the deadline and pierce/shaq were gone before the all star game. It's just smart. My point is he could have gotten the 40, and dealt him. Best offensive player? Uh. Hes definitely up there. Anyways, im not trying to decrease his value just was trying to help out with an opinion it wasnt meant to be an argumentative point. He's not listening to me. I don't give him any advice really on his team. But as Rose improves, I don't think he's gonna have any problem winning 40 with his backcourt for quite a few years of Pierce's contract, so I don't see the need to dump Pierce unless he's getting his picks back, which he isn't. What he gets back just won't help. |
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Sept 7, 2008 16:51:32 GMT -5
Anyway, I don't know how you brought keeping Rose into the argument, but there's absolutely no reason to deal Rose right now or anytime soon.
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Sept 7, 2008 19:52:35 GMT -5
Point being he might have to deal rose at some point because hes going nowhere with his current cast.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Sept 7, 2008 21:52:32 GMT -5
gentlemen, please.
|
|
