|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Dec 30, 2007 20:41:52 GMT -5
....do I add an extra bird year to one of my players
|
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Dec 30, 2007 21:16:35 GMT -5
I dont' think you do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Dec 30, 2007 22:53:44 GMT -5
Me neither'.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Dec 30, 2007 22:57:58 GMT -5
Spence said he would allow you to add 1 bird year to a guy with a 3 year contract....so probaly just extend one guy
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Dec 30, 2007 23:08:31 GMT -5
Really? Nice, I think it's a good idea, cuz a lot of us didn't know 5th was the last round with 3+ years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 31, 2007 1:21:02 GMT -5
I decided against it since it seemed like Gms had mixed opinions on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Dec 31, 2007 2:45:24 GMT -5
I decided against it since it seemed like Gms had mixed opinions on it. boo!!!!!!! we made a trade adn pick based on that rule. |
|
WillC
Scrub
Original 76ers GM
Posts: 303
|
Post by WillC on Dec 31, 2007 6:03:02 GMT -5
It seems kind of unrealistic that the average team will only have 3 players with bird years.
In other words, that's only 3 out of 15 players that the team will be able to keep.
Imagine if the team you support in real life could only keep three of its players. That would kind of suck in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Dec 31, 2007 9:20:12 GMT -5
Will with the expansion draft the best 90 players in the league won't be FAs for 3 years. Do we really want to raise that to the best 120 players are not going to be FAs for 3 years?
|
|
WillC
Scrub
Original 76ers GM
Posts: 303
|
Post by WillC on Dec 31, 2007 9:30:59 GMT -5
I don't mind when the players expire. It'd just be nice for the team to at least have a chance of re-signing them.
Maybe we could add a Bird Year to these players without adding an extra year to their contract?
That way, the FA pool will still be fairly decent in a few years, but teams will still stand a chance of re-signing their players.
|
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Dec 31, 2007 9:51:17 GMT -5
You can still offer 120% of their contract.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aaron2344 on Dec 31, 2007 10:55:48 GMT -5
I'm with Will on this one. This provides a happy medium for all parties involved.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 31, 2007 12:07:17 GMT -5
If someone starts a thread, and it gets a majority vote, Ill change it.
|
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Jan 1, 2008 2:01:27 GMT -5
I don't mind when the players expire. It'd just be nice for the team to at least have a chance of re-signing them. Maybe we could add a Bird Year to these players without adding an extra year to their contract? That way, the FA pool will still be fairly decent in a few years, but teams will still stand a chance of re-signing their players. i second this. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 1, 2008 2:16:30 GMT -5
If someone starts a thread, and it gets a majority vote, Ill change it. |
|
