|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Dec 17, 2008 13:46:52 GMT -5
Clippers, Denver, Jazz, Sonics are easily better than the Celtics, the 8th seed in the East.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Dec 17, 2008 13:48:36 GMT -5
I'm talking about the top-8 teams in the East, not the current standings. The best team in the East (MIL) isn't even in the top-8 right now.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Dec 17, 2008 13:52:32 GMT -5
Seattle is going to be such a scary team. I wouldn't be surprised if they won the West this year.
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Dec 17, 2008 14:50:49 GMT -5
if u arent in the top 8 right now, then ur not a top 8 right now. there are west teams better than the bucks. the bucks arent even that great.
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Dec 17, 2008 14:51:22 GMT -5
how the fuck are the pacers 14-3 though. there are so many teams in this league with mroe talent.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Dec 17, 2008 14:56:19 GMT -5
if u arent in the top 8 right now, then ur not a top 8 right now. there are west teams better than the bucks. the bucks arent even that great. absolutely mindless. did you even see who they added last night? did you take note of the fact that they made the finals last year and just added josh smith?
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Dec 17, 2008 15:00:36 GMT -5
i see they added josh smith as one i saw the trade and two he simmed with him last night. i also see a team with holes.
|
|
|
Post by dj on Dec 17, 2008 15:01:59 GMT -5
finally some Ws.
|
|
|
Post by easy on Dec 17, 2008 15:05:02 GMT -5
i see they added josh smith as one i saw the trade and two he simmed with him last night. i also see a team with holes. i post before i read the whole thread. wouldnt have to say it if you were active enough in the league to know the trades that are going on. bring vernon back.
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Dec 17, 2008 15:05:39 GMT -5
and no im not saying my team is good. im sure thats your next angle.
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Dec 17, 2008 15:06:13 GMT -5
marty you are a retard.
|
|
|
Post by easy on Dec 17, 2008 15:09:56 GMT -5
I like you. You remind me of when I was young and stupid.
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Dec 17, 2008 15:12:19 GMT -5
I like you. You remind me of when I was young and stupid. i cant even make a comeback to this. you just scared the fuck out of me.
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Dec 17, 2008 15:15:23 GMT -5
Marty wanted 6 1sts for Harrison Barnes
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Dec 17, 2008 15:17:03 GMT -5
if u arent in the top 8 right now, then ur not a top 8 right now. there are west teams better than the bucks. the bucks arent even that great. This is probably the dumbest logic I've seen. Haha OK Bill Parcells, drop the "you are what your record says you are" nonsense. There aren't any West teams close to the Bucks. There probably aren't any East teams better than the Bucks. It's not exactly difficult to look at rosters and make judgments on how good a team is. If you see "holes" on the Bucks (which is a little self-loving if you ask me, but OK), then what do you see in the completely awful (by comparison to the Bucks) Western teams?
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Dec 17, 2008 15:18:58 GMT -5
I'd put the top-8 Eastern teams (in no order) as: Heat, Knicks, Nets, Wizards, Bucks, Pistons, 76ers, Hawks. That doesn't include the 14-3 Pacers.
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Dec 17, 2008 15:19:26 GMT -5
if u arent in the top 8 right now, then ur not a top 8 right now. there are west teams better than the bucks. the bucks arent even that great. This is probably the dumbest logic I've seen. Haha OK Bill Parcells, drop the "you are what your record says you are" nonsense. There aren't any West teams close to the Bucks. There probably aren't any East teams better than the Bucks. It's not exactly difficult to look at rosters and make judgments on how good a team is. If you see "holes" on the Bucks (which is a little self-loving if you ask me, but OK), then what do you see in the completely awful (by comparison to the Bucks) Western teams? you are what your record says you are. if i was joining this league and taking a team that i wanted to win the title this year, i wouldnt select the bucks. there are better teams in this league than the bucks. u really believe they are the best team in this league? wow
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Dec 17, 2008 15:20:22 GMT -5
And every team has holes. That's not a valid argument at all. But I'm curious. What Western teams are better than the Bucks?
|
|
|
Post by cjmjones008 on Dec 17, 2008 15:20:25 GMT -5
I have some big holes but my guys took over last year in the playoffs. I am counting on them doing it again. Even when I had weaker teams with Emeka we still always managed the conference finals because he was so good.
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Dec 17, 2008 15:21:21 GMT -5
in a million years ill never understand how hte pacers are 14-3
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Dec 17, 2008 15:22:06 GMT -5
This is probably the dumbest logic I've seen. Haha OK Bill Parcells, drop the "you are what your record says you are" nonsense. There aren't any West teams close to the Bucks. There probably aren't any East teams better than the Bucks. It's not exactly difficult to look at rosters and make judgments on how good a team is. If you see "holes" on the Bucks (which is a little self-loving if you ask me, but OK), then what do you see in the completely awful (by comparison to the Bucks) Western teams? you are what your record says you are. if i was joining this league and taking a team that i wanted to win the title this year, i wouldnt select the bucks. there are better teams in this league than the bucks. u really believe they are the best team in this league? wow You're this incapable of projecting out talent over the course of a season?
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Dec 17, 2008 15:22:54 GMT -5
And every team has holes. That's not a valid argument at all. But I'm curious. What Western teams are better than the Bucks? Clippers Jazz Sonics and possibly the nuggets if ducky would quit being a dumbass and move a SG to get a PG.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Dec 17, 2008 15:23:58 GMT -5
This is probably the dumbest logic I've seen. Haha OK Bill Parcells, drop the "you are what your record says you are" nonsense. There aren't any West teams close to the Bucks. There probably aren't any East teams better than the Bucks. It's not exactly difficult to look at rosters and make judgments on how good a team is. If you see "holes" on the Bucks (which is a little self-loving if you ask me, but OK), then what do you see in the completely awful (by comparison to the Bucks) Western teams? you are what your record says you are. if i was joining this league and taking a team that i wanted to win the title this year, i wouldnt select the bucks. there are better teams in this league than the bucks. u really believe they are the best team in this league? wow I'm a perfect example. My team was 2-4. I changed my DC and added no players. I've gone 7-1 since then. Same roster. So in a matter of 24 hours I went from shitty non-playoff team to in the hunt? With no moves made but a DC change? This is absurd. I know you're not talking about my team but I think it is a good example. People looked at it as a "top" team going into the season, and I doubt anyone changed their mind when I started 2-4. It's a matter of looking at a roster, knowing how people perform, and judging a team.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Dec 17, 2008 15:24:21 GMT -5
And every team has holes. That's not a valid argument at all. But I'm curious. What Western teams are better than the Bucks? Clippers Jazz Sonics and possibly the nuggets if ducky would quit being a dumbass and move a SG to get a PG. To quote yourself, "wow".
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Dec 17, 2008 15:24:25 GMT -5
I have some big holes but my guys took over last year in the playoffs. I am counting on them doing it again. Even when I had weaker teams with Emeka we still always managed the conference finals because he was so good. could be possible as fbb playoffs tend to benefit teams with stars far more than balanced teams. its not like im saying the bucks suck. but i dont see them as a favorite like mark does
|
|