|
Post by GP on Jan 28, 2009 15:26:42 GMT -5
I've listed the 10 best IMO...Vote other and explain what other team should be considered and why?
|
|
|
Post by easy on Jan 28, 2009 15:28:00 GMT -5
terrible news.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jan 28, 2009 15:38:57 GMT -5
I think it comes down to Miami, Memphis and my team. Doesn't mean they're the best lineups, though. At first I thought I'd go with mine because we're top ten in literally every category other than turnovers, and I think that reflects the fact that I have a complete lineup, but I also think Skillz has idea player at every position, and Oden is the dealbreaker.
|
|
|
Post by GP on Jan 28, 2009 15:42:47 GMT -5
Yeah, it's on paper. Not neccessarily the best statistical/performance team.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Jan 28, 2009 15:49:23 GMT -5
Seattle
|
|
|
Post by noves on Jan 28, 2009 15:49:39 GMT -5
Grizz. I'd beat them though when healthy.
|
|
Derwin
Starter
Ex-GM
Posts: 2,832
|
Post by Derwin on Jan 28, 2009 15:50:55 GMT -5
I feel like the Sonics would be the considerable favorites, but the kink in that team is clearly Sven at SF.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Jan 28, 2009 15:53:38 GMT -5
I actually think Sven is perfect for their team
|
|
|
Post by AllStar0608 on Jan 28, 2009 15:57:37 GMT -5
heat
|
|
|
Post by GP on Jan 28, 2009 15:59:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jan 28, 2009 16:03:12 GMT -5
IMO, the heat just have inferior pieces. cousins and freeman are not great players. skillz has him beat pretty easily. wins at the 3-4-5 and is very, very close in the backcourt.
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Jan 28, 2009 16:06:50 GMT -5
We just can't get it together right now
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Jan 28, 2009 16:07:39 GMT -5
IMO, the heat just have inferior pieces. cousins and freeman are not great players. skillz has him beat pretty easily. wins at the 3-4-5 and is very, very close in the backcourt. we're not even top 10
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Jan 28, 2009 16:08:06 GMT -5
IMO, the heat just have inferior pieces. cousins and freeman are not great players. skillz has him beat pretty easily. wins at the 3-4-5 and is very, very close in the backcourt. we're not even top 10 fact
|
|
|
Post by easy on Jan 28, 2009 16:11:17 GMT -5
Spurs
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jan 28, 2009 16:18:09 GMT -5
LOL @ me not having a top-10 SL. I'd probably say Memphis as the best though.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jan 28, 2009 16:19:14 GMT -5
Aaron's is really good too. I'd probably put him second in terms of complete SL.
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Jan 28, 2009 16:20:13 GMT -5
I like his 1-4 but Biedrins sucks
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Jan 28, 2009 16:20:36 GMT -5
and that's the worst position to be bad at in my opinion
|
|
|
Post by easy on Jan 28, 2009 16:20:56 GMT -5
LOL @ me not having a top-10 SL. I'd probably say Memphis as the best though. on paper, no
|
|
|
Post by easy on Jan 28, 2009 16:21:09 GMT -5
and I mean you not Skillz
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jan 28, 2009 16:21:41 GMT -5
LOL @ me not having a top-10 SL. I'd probably say Memphis as the best though. on paper, no With Oden I think they are. Nocedal-Dex-Beas-Blake-Oden is pretty incredible.
|
|
|
Post by easy on Jan 28, 2009 16:22:04 GMT -5
Blazers (K. Walker, Seflosha, Montijunas, Aldridge
how is that a "complete" line-up with only 4 players? THIS POLL IS GARBAGE
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Jan 28, 2009 16:22:09 GMT -5
and I mean you not Skillz Conley-Green-Durant-Cisse-Darko isn't a top-10 SL? Haha, OK.
|
|
|
Post by easy on Jan 28, 2009 16:22:18 GMT -5
and I mean you not Skillz
|
|