|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 9, 2009 15:04:48 GMT -5
Any ideas to make FA better?
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Feb 9, 2009 15:06:10 GMT -5
I think its fine. No need to change.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Feb 9, 2009 15:06:18 GMT -5
Yeah, fucking choosing the prospects that sign with us. So I don't get my ass pounded by you fucks on sigining 3 PG's.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix Phil on Feb 9, 2009 15:07:05 GMT -5
minimum 3 years contract if you want to give a player coming off his rookie contract a first year max
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 9, 2009 15:07:12 GMT -5
Yeah, fucking choosing the prospects that sign with us. So I don't get my ass pounded by you fucks on sigining 3 PG's. You love getting attacked. It gives you reason to show us we were wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Feb 9, 2009 15:08:25 GMT -5
yep
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 9, 2009 15:08:57 GMT -5
minimum 3 years contract if you want to give a player coming off his rookie contract a first year max I think this makes some sense. Its easy to monitor. It levels the playing field. and 3 yrs is more reasonable then 1 or 2. The older the player gets, the more likely he is to just take a 1 yr contract. What about not trading a 1 yr signed player until after the AS break? What about bringing back the free MAX 1 player every 5 years idea? |
|
|
|
Post by Sheryl Yoast on Feb 9, 2009 15:09:02 GMT -5
You know you have done bad when you have the king of shitty FA signings......Galo......going after you due to shitty FA signings.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 9, 2009 15:09:42 GMT -5
You know you have done bad when you have the king of shitty FA signings......Galo......going after you due to shitty FA signings. lol. Like Ducky saying your posts are useless. Or All Star saying your activity sucks. |
|
|
|
Post by easy on Feb 9, 2009 15:12:09 GMT -5
or like me saying you suck!
|
|
|
|
Post by GP on Feb 9, 2009 15:12:25 GMT -5
You know you have done bad when you have the king of shitty FA signings......Galo......going after you due to shitty FA signings. lol at least the players I signed to bad contracts at the time were under 30. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 9, 2009 15:12:27 GMT -5
EXACTLY!
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 9, 2009 15:12:47 GMT -5
You know you have done bad when you have the king of shitty FA signings......Galo......going after you due to shitty FA signings. lol at least the players I signed to bad contracts at the time were under 30. So you had more time to regret it? |
|
|
|
Post by GP on Feb 9, 2009 15:13:22 GMT -5
lol at least the players I signed to bad contracts at the time were under 30. So you had more time to regret it? well yeah. |
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Feb 9, 2009 15:14:37 GMT -5
It's stupid to introduce variables and limitations on what you can offer a free agent. Completely contradicts the concept.
My idea is that we make bids public when requested. That way, if you lose a guy, it's your fault; you know what you're up against and what FBB favors, so if you don't match it, sucks for you. The Sven case is bizarre. Ducky could, and did offer more than Maniac could. Imagine it just being FBB's version of a qualifying offer. Sven feels he's worth more than what Maniac offered (which he is), and takes a higher salary with the hopes that next season he gets the contract he deserves. Completely within reason. Anyway, even if it weren't, the game is what it is, so you plan accordingly. Everyone does. No need to introduce case-by-case restrictions or any type of restrictions for that matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny "B. Good" Stamos on Feb 9, 2009 15:14:55 GMT -5
What about the guys that suck that are coming off their rookie deals and you just give them a one year max because you need a large contract and you dont have anyone else with birds!
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 9, 2009 15:16:36 GMT -5
Its flawed either way. Im not sure I like any of the ideas floated enough to implement them. were just talking.
|
|
|
|
Post by GP on Feb 9, 2009 15:16:37 GMT -5
What about the guys that suck that are coming off their rookie deals and you just give them a one year max because you need a large contract and you dont have anyone else with birds! Good point. It's tough either way. |
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Feb 9, 2009 15:17:17 GMT -5
I agree with something like what Blue said. I wouldn't even have had a problem with Ducky signing Sven for 2 years/12.5 million per. At least he'd have a contract on the books for more than one season. It wouldn't be such a cheap way to lose a player.
I think anyone under something like the age of 27 shouldn't be offered deals like this. It's either a.) exposing the flaw in FBB or b.) trying to sign a player to a large expiring for trade purposes.
If you have bird rights on a player you should be able to do whatever you want with him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Feb 9, 2009 15:19:03 GMT -5
Probably keep it the same.
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Feb 9, 2009 15:53:02 GMT -5
I think its fine. No need to change. |
|
|
|
Post by easy on Feb 9, 2009 15:54:41 GMT -5
ducky your fucking worthless
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Feb 9, 2009 16:00:04 GMT -5
ducky your fucking worthless Says the man with 0 championships. |
|
|
|
Post by easy on Feb 9, 2009 16:15:00 GMT -5
ducky your fucking worthless Says the man with 0 championships. are you talking about yourself?  |
|
GMGreggor
All-Star
Houston Rockets
Posts: 5,726
|
Post by GMGreggor on Feb 9, 2009 16:17:26 GMT -5
minimum 3 years contract if you want to give a player coming off his rookie contract a first year max I think this makes some sense. Its easy to monitor. It levels the playing field. and 3 yrs is more reasonable then 1 or 2. The older the player gets, the more likely he is to just take a 1 yr contract. What about not trading a 1 yr signed player until after the AS break? What about bringing back the free MAX 1 player every 5 years idea? Dont like the one yr AS break rule. Sometimes guys get signed for filler for other deals. I think that would hurt activity. Other 2 seem like good ideas though. |
|
