|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Nov 25, 2009 19:46:48 GMT -5
that is not what it said, but yes I did correct it. Nice try though. hahahaha yes it was not even remotely funny, but no you switched around some words this is pointless really
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Nov 25, 2009 19:48:01 GMT -5
that would make sense if UOSLR was ever inactive, because it hasn't been. there are 8-10 articles per season in UOSLR. that is because it is a brand new league, less than a year old. We started in the 90s so of course it is going to be active. It has recently been booming because we have moved into 2000 and beyond. BBS was crazy active during that time as well. Sometimes leagues takes hits, UOSLR will do this as well. You can't deny that the league is active because of the era it is in. activity is not booming basone, it's the same it's always been.
|
|
|
Post by DB on Nov 25, 2009 19:48:12 GMT -5
why would this generate interest for only 1 or 2 seasons. Once we hit the 90s it is going to be booming. It will be awesome. Everyone will be active i am sure. I am going by what I have read from people when Spencer brought up the inactivity... if I recall correctly he himself suggested that activity would improve once we hit the 90s, but what I got from people's responses wasn't that we were in the 70s as the reason this league was "inactive" it was simply because they didn't have the time they once did. I don't see how being in the 90s is going to help people be more active when they are time constrained as it is with real life things. Come on Marty, that is a bullshit excuse from GMs just to say that they're trying but really they are bored as shit with their teams. If we hit the 90s people would start going crazy and things will start to pick up. I believe this it has happened in tons of leagues, this is the problem. People do not care about these guys coming through the drafts.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Nov 25, 2009 19:48:38 GMT -5
that is because it is a brand new league, less than a year old. We started in the 90s so of course it is going to be active. It has recently been booming because we have moved into 2000 and beyond. BBS was crazy active during that time as well. Sometimes leagues takes hits, UOSLR will do this as well. You can't deny that the league is active because of the era it is in. activity is not booming basone, it's the same it's always been. do you think it's pure coincidence that alot of guys that got fired for inactivity in UOSLR are the same guys who are inactive in this league but are still gms?
|
|
|
Post by DB on Nov 25, 2009 19:49:04 GMT -5
that is because it is a brand new league, less than a year old. We started in the 90s so of course it is going to be active. It has recently been booming because we have moved into 2000 and beyond. BBS was crazy active during that time as well. Sometimes leagues takes hits, UOSLR will do this as well. You can't deny that the league is active because of the era it is in. activity is not booming basone, it's the same it's always been. I think it has picked up recently.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Nov 25, 2009 19:49:22 GMT -5
not even remotely funny, but no you switched around some words this is pointless really lol no i didn't
|
|
|
Post by DB on Nov 25, 2009 19:50:01 GMT -5
activity is not booming basone, it's the same it's always been. do you think it's pure coincidence that alot of guys that got fired for inactivity in UOSLR are the same guys who are inactive in this league but are still gms? who? Maniac? thats one guy.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Nov 25, 2009 19:50:55 GMT -5
I am going by what I have read from people when Spencer brought up the inactivity... if I recall correctly he himself suggested that activity would improve once we hit the 90s, but what I got from people's responses wasn't that we were in the 70s as the reason this league was "inactive" it was simply because they didn't have the time they once did. I don't see how being in the 90s is going to help people be more active when they are time constrained as it is with real life things. Come on Marty, that is a bullshit excuse from GMs just to say that they're trying but really they are bored as shit with their teams. If we hit the 90s people would start going crazy and things will start to pick up. I believe this it has happened in tons of leagues, this is the problem. People do not care about these guys coming through the drafts. OK I am not denying it will boost activity, it obviously will, but would it have made an Ebener more active? Is it going to make Maniac more active? I don't think draft classes or the year were in is what's wrong with this league tbh
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Nov 25, 2009 19:51:48 GMT -5
Come on Marty, that is a bullshit excuse from GMs just to say that they're trying but really they are bored as shit with their teams. If we hit the 90s people would start going crazy and things will start to pick up. I believe this it has happened in tons of leagues, this is the problem. People do not care about these guys coming through the drafts. OK I am not denying it will boost activity, it obviously will, but would it have made an Ebener more active? Is it going to make Maniac more active? I don't think draft classes or the year were in is what's wrong with this league tbh We've already seen one inactive guy say it would make him more interested, so there goes this argument.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Nov 25, 2009 19:51:48 GMT -5
do you think it's pure coincidence that alot of guys that got fired for inactivity in UOSLR are the same guys who are inactive in this league but are still gms? who? Maniac? thats one guy. outlawz? he was forced into activity because of his CY and because people egged him on about how CC was better than him now. he's def improved but hes nowhere near the level he was
|
|
|
Post by DB on Nov 25, 2009 19:51:40 GMT -5
Come on Marty, that is a bullshit excuse from GMs just to say that they're trying but really they are bored as shit with their teams. If we hit the 90s people would start going crazy and things will start to pick up. I believe this it has happened in tons of leagues, this is the problem. People do not care about these guys coming through the drafts. OK I am not denying it will boost activity, it obviously will, but would it have made an Ebener more active? Is it going to make Maniac more active? I don't think draft classes or the year were in is what's wrong with this league tbh You don't know that and neither do I but activity went DOWN tremendously since retro.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Nov 25, 2009 19:52:17 GMT -5
OK I am not denying it will boost activity, it obviously will, but would it have made an Ebener more active? Is it going to make Maniac more active? I don't think draft classes or the year were in is what's wrong with this league tbh We've already seen one inactive guy say it would make him more interested, so there goes this argument. and who is that?
|
|
travesy3
Scrub
Philadelphia 76ers
Can I be a star? Does fame in this game have to change who you are?
Posts: 421
|
Post by travesy3 on Nov 25, 2009 19:52:26 GMT -5
If we were in more modern drafts it would make it easier to bring new GM's into the league.
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Nov 25, 2009 19:52:47 GMT -5
We've already seen one inactive guy say it would make him more interested, so there goes this argument. and who is that? traves
|
|
|
Post by DB on Nov 25, 2009 19:52:56 GMT -5
who? Maniac? thats one guy. outlawz? he was forced into activity because of his CY and because people egged him on about how CC was better than him now. he's def improved but hes nowhere near the level he was outlawz did not give a shit about UOSLR. He is fine activity wise here. Some people yes need to pick it up, but it is hard because of where the league is at. That is why spencer is simming fast.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Nov 25, 2009 19:53:21 GMT -5
It's not some big coincidence that activity went way down once we went retro. Nobody knew the guys coming in and it was a lot less interesting than the created players. Activity will pick up big time with 80s classes.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Nov 25, 2009 19:53:12 GMT -5
i think it's safe to say that traves is more active than alot of people here, possibly even more than me
|
|
travesy3
Scrub
Philadelphia 76ers
Can I be a star? Does fame in this game have to change who you are?
Posts: 421
|
Post by travesy3 on Nov 25, 2009 19:53:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Nov 25, 2009 19:54:35 GMT -5
Yeah. No offense, but you definitely are.
|
|
travesy3
Scrub
Philadelphia 76ers
Can I be a star? Does fame in this game have to change who you are?
Posts: 421
|
Post by travesy3 on Nov 25, 2009 19:54:25 GMT -5
Just saying I would rather be in the run of a guy I actually know or am familiar with then McGinnis last year or Gervin this year.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Nov 25, 2009 19:55:29 GMT -5
outlawz? he was forced into activity because of his CY and because people egged him on about how CC was better than him now. he's def improved but hes nowhere near the level he was outlawz did not give a shit about UOSLR. He is fine activity wise here. Some people yes need to pick it up, but it is hard because of where the league is at. That is why spencer is simming fast. if his activity were fine he would never ever hit his CY or get called out on it. Look, do I think this will promote activity? Yes, I am not denying it and I hope the league proves me wrong when I say this but this will not last long activity wise
|
|
|
Post by Rocky on Nov 25, 2009 19:56:14 GMT -5
Outlawz doesn't have a computer right now. It's impossible to be active without a computer. I just went a month without my computer, it was so difficult to keep up.
|
|
|
Post by SOME BIG ASS TDS on Nov 25, 2009 19:57:31 GMT -5
Outlawz doesn't have a computer right now. It's impossible to be active without a computer. I just went a month without my computer, it was so difficult to keep up. whether or not the reason for a person's activity is a valid one or not doesn't really matter the person is still inactive all the same and it kind of proves my point that it's not about the year or draft classes we're doing, it's more reasons going on as to why people are inactive.
|
|
|
Post by DB on Nov 25, 2009 19:58:35 GMT -5
People will find ways to be active i can bet that. It will be a lot better.
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Nov 25, 2009 19:58:48 GMT -5
Outlawz is really active. This is such a stupid argument. Martinez acknowledges it will create activity and has no reason to be against it. He's just a prick trying to save face.
|
|