|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 7, 2008 13:07:50 GMT -5
85551043
24 hours.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny "B. Good" Stamos on Nov 7, 2008 13:08:10 GMT -5
haha again? That sucks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Nov 7, 2008 13:19:32 GMT -5
Dear god.
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Nov 7, 2008 13:23:35 GMT -5
Good work.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Nov 7, 2008 13:28:56 GMT -5
this is unbelievable.
|
|
Outlawz
All-League
New York Knicks
Going back to basics
Posts: 7,853
|
Post by Outlawz on Nov 7, 2008 13:29:09 GMT -5
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by GP on Nov 7, 2008 14:07:25 GMT -5
how many teams has it been now?
|
|
Ducky
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,215
|
Post by Ducky on Nov 7, 2008 16:35:46 GMT -5
omg... another one?
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Nov 7, 2008 16:48:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Gossip Girl on Nov 7, 2008 16:51:17 GMT -5
wooooo
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Fantasy on Nov 7, 2008 23:08:36 GMT -5
i thought my math was right . . . but i was wrong. I'm only over by half a mil or so. . . anyone wanna help?
jr smith can go for a lesser player on a bad contract or a package of lesser players.
Dixon's exp for a chump on a multi year deal
wright can go for a player of lesser value. . .
help[ me damn it. . . instead of being haters help
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Nov 8, 2008 0:49:37 GMT -5
Its going to be a glaring problem in the league. When salaries are at a greater percentage towards the hard cap then they are towards the salary cap this is going to happen especially when you are this far into the league and starting salaries keep rising. I've said it for a long time lower the cap or raise the hard cap something has to give. These teams who are flirting with the hard cap aren't powerhouses and if you look at majority of teams around the league the amount of teams who have 5 or more minimum contracts but less than 13 players overall is staggering.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 8, 2008 0:58:09 GMT -5
You are dead to me Fredo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Nov 8, 2008 1:05:19 GMT -5
everryyyy rose has its thorn
|
|
Dave
All-Star
Ex-GM
Posts: 7,222
|
Post by Dave on Nov 8, 2008 1:10:32 GMT -5
You are dead to me Fredo. Realistically the league won't last you'll be forced to restart. I don't know why you are so stubborn at times. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 8, 2008 1:13:49 GMT -5
Itll have to restart because of the HC? Thats ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Nov 8, 2008 1:14:55 GMT -5
LOL @ Dave thinking the league will restart because of the HC. Still, in some ways I agree that the HC should be increased by at least a little. Maybe to 88-90? There have been a bunch of mediocre teams going over.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 8, 2008 1:19:16 GMT -5
Why though? I mean its 85, why should you go over? Its the limit, it doesn't make sense to me that legitimately you should go over. The Mavericks were ruined by Dave's inability to get under 85, when in fact he had many opportunities to. I just don't get why its the fault of the rules.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 8, 2008 1:20:25 GMT -5
Itd be easier to be a GM if the HC was 90. Itd be easier if there was no contract year. Itd be easier if we had retards as Gms too, but Im not gonna hit up the Ronald McDonald house for new GMs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ebener 12 on Nov 8, 2008 1:23:53 GMT -5
BAN SKILLSZ FROM TRADING I CANT KEEP UP
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 8, 2008 1:25:19 GMT -5
I also never understand the logic that the HC should be a certain percentage of the regular salary cap. It just doesn't make sense. The Salary Cap only really affects salaries. So as long as that doesn't change, why would the HC ever have to change?
|
|
|
|
Post by Funky George! on Nov 8, 2008 1:28:55 GMT -5
This argument is ridiculous. Raising the HC a few mil would allow for more flexibility, but so what? If you think that will change the complexion of the league and save it from some inevitable death, think again. It'll just give a few extra mil in spending money and tons of teams will right below or at that salary threshold in no time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 8, 2008 1:30:31 GMT -5
It will lead to people still going over the HC, but instead at 88 or 90 or whatever.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Nov 8, 2008 1:33:10 GMT -5
Why though? I mean its 85, why should you go over? Its the limit, it doesn't make sense to me that legitimately you should go over. The Mavericks were ruined by Dave's inability to get under 85, when in fact he had many opportunities to. I just don't get why its the fault of the rules. Good point. I don't care really either way. More competition yee! |
|
|
|
Post by Skillz on Nov 8, 2008 1:33:28 GMT -5
Why the fuck was i complaining?
I got bron because of the hc and hornets 16 because of it
lolz
|
|
